Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
The conclusion - 'This is the first evidence from an experimental study of greater emotional suppression in individuals with CFS compared to healthy controls, from both self-report and observer ratings.
I'd say this has all the hallmarks of a study dreamed up for a PhD student to do, rather than for any medically valid reason. Nice easy experiment, lots of simple things to measure, lots of vaguely related studies to summarise in the introduction to show you've done your reading research, and a handy supply of dupes in the queue at a couple of psych. based CFS clinics waiting for 'treatment' for their fatigue.
...
Suppression of emotions is found to be higher in CFS patients.
Huh??? Well of course it is, they've been referred to a psych. based service for an illness they experience as a physical illness. Of course they're going to hide their emotions so as not to be further misdiagnosed. And they don't know the purpose of the experiment...
... and said wee wee a few times.
Thought it looked familiar!
Beliefs About Emotions Scale.
The Beliefs About Emotions
Scale (BES; Rimes & Chalder, 2010) assesses beliefs about the
unacceptability of experiencing or expressing negative emotions.
This is a 12-item scale that includes items such as “It is a sign of
weakness if I have miserable thoughts” and “To be acceptable to
others, I must keep any difficulties or negative feelings to myself.”
Response options ranged from 0 (totally disagree )to 6 (totally
agree) Higher scores indicate greater endorsement of unhelpful
beliefs about emotions. Rimes and Chalder (2010) found that
participants with CFS have significantly higher scores on this
questionnaire than healthy participants. In the current study the
scale had good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .87).
Can she really think this study is valid or useful?
Another thread filled with the rather predictable criticisms of ME/CFS patients. I really think that a lot of patients do not understand their own disease all that well at the neuropsychological level.
Another thread filled with the rather predictable criticisms of ME/CFS patients. I really think that a lot of patients do not understand their own disease all that well at the neuropsychological level.
Bollocks. This is just another in a long string of terrible psychiatric "studies" that attempt to mask subjectivity with seemingly objective instruments.
"According to new research from researcher B. Cosby, young women in the entertainment industry can benefit from individual career mentorship."
2. Choice of 'emotional stimulus:
'Materials and Measures Emotion induction. A 9-min clip from a British Broadcasting Corporation documentary called “Britain’s Homecare Scandal,” originally shown in 2003 as part of the “Panorama” series, was used to elicit an emotional response. It shows scenes of reduced quality of care given to older adults by homecare services. The film clip was piloted on 15 individuals (seven CFS participants and eight healthy control participants). It produced an increase in ratings of emotional distress including anger, sadness, and disgust. This complex emotional response was considered to have appropriate ecological validity.'
Huh???? So you're comparing emotional reactions and suppression of emotions in healthy and sick people and you choose a stimulus that is likely to have much higher emotional resonance with the sick people who may already have encountered difficulties with care services, or be concerned about their care needs in future. How is that a valid comparison.