From a very brief look, her approach seems glib, immature and opportunistic, with several shaky premises underpinning it, namely:
- that she had the same illness as all other PWME
- that the results other PWME get from the tests she had will necessarily be identical to her results
- that the test results she feels were significant in her case were in fact significant in causing and/or perpetuating her illness
- that the treatments she attributes her "cure" to are what effected her "cure"
I could go on, but I won't. I sense the Dunning-Kruger Effect in operation here, viz. the "metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude".