We don't know how far the paper got in the peer review process. Perhaps the editor instantly declined it, perhaps it was one of the reviewers, we don't know and shouldn't speculate.Is it confirmed peer reviewed and then rejected?
All we know is that Prusty said that he would submit for publication, which if the journal would accept will upload a preprint. Only if it doesn't get accepted will he upload it to the Arvix. That is what he said.
And now it has been uploaded on the Arvix.
It's also not too unnormal that a paper is rejected at the first journal. Some journals have low acceptance rates. This paper will be published at some point in time, we don't have to worry about that. There's several journals with ME/CFS expertise, for example Scheibenbogen's most recent paper was reviewed by Maureen Hanson and Olli Polo and edited by Nuno Sepulveda. Perhaps he first wanted to go for a very well regarded microbiological journal and pushed his luck a bit too much at that journal, who knows. I'm not suprised that a paper with clear and influential errors is not published. Perhaps these errors are only due to them bringing the paper out asap instead of taking a year to writing everything down carefully.
I'm keen to see how things will look once the preprint is updated. People aren't dissapointed in the paper itself, people are dissapointed in the statements he made surrounding its release, which I can understand. There might still be a lot of analysis happening in the background, who knows.
Last edited: