If I were to make a recommendation, I would suggest any complaints not address the controversy as to cause of CFS. Although we see lots of evidence of non-psychological cause, just remember the scientific community, including this lady's bosses or professors, may either be unsure or actually believe it is psychological.
In other words, from the world's perspective, it is still up to debate. So anyone promoting their view is perfectly fine.
But, it should be done in a professional manner, without personal attacks and without obscenities. If she wants to be taken seriously as a scientist, then the rhetoric needs to focus on reasoning and logic, or she will lose credibility.
Oh, and by the same token, while we are not professionals and speaking with some expertise or authority, same advice needs to be applied to our own discussions, if we want others to listen to us with an open mind.
But someone who is promoting themselves or others promote as an expert or a professional with expertise, hurts their own credibility when the rhetoric reflects more of the Rush Limbaugh style. And if there is an issue there for this lady, then that is what should be addressed in complaints to her superiors or her professors.
JMHO
Tina