• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Pain Physiology Education Improves Pain Beliefs in Patients With CFS vs Pacing


Senior Member
Newish research

Pain Physiology Education Improves Pain Beliefs in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Compared With Pacing and Self-Management Education: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;91( 8 ):1153-1159.

Meeus M, Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, Van Alsenoy V, Truijen S.

Division of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Artesis University College, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium.


Meeus M, Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, Van Alsenoy V, Truijen S. Pain physiology education improves pain beliefs in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared with pacing and self-management education: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether pain physiology education was capable of changing pain cognitions and pain thresholds in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and chronic widespread pain.

DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Specialized chronic fatigue clinic in university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of patients (N=48) with CFS patients (8 men, 40 women) experiencing chronic pain, randomly allocated to the control group (n=24) or experimental group (n=24). Two women in the experimental group did not complete the study because of practical issues (lack of time and restricted mobility).

INTERVENTIONS: One individual pain physiology education session
(experimental) or 1 pacing and self-management education session (control).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Algometry, the Neurophysiology of Pain Test, and questionnaires evaluating pain cognitions-the Pain Coping Inventory, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-version CFS-were completed immediately before and immediately after the intervention.

RESULTS: After the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated a significantly better understanding of the neurophysiology of pain
(P<.001) and a reduction of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale subscale "ruminating" (P=.009) compared with controls. For these variables, moderate to large Cohen d effect sizes were revealed (.79-2.53).

CONCLUSIONS: A 30-minute educational session on pain physiology imparts a better understanding of pain and brings about less rumination in the short term.
Pain physiology education can be an important therapeutic modality in the approach of patients with CFS and chronic pain, given the clinical relevance of inappropriate pain cognitions.
Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


Senior Member
Rules for letters to the editor for this journal

Rules for letters to the editor for this journal:

Letters to The Editor: Letters are published at the discretion of the Editorial Board. Letters should be brief and directly related to the published article on which it comments. Letters may not reference unpublished studies or reference "in press" studies that are not publicly available. The editorial staff reserves the right to condense and edit without consulting the writer. Letters must be limited to 500 words of text, 1 table, and no more than 5 references.