I have been watching since the beginning and am so far quite pleased, I am surprised to say. Great focus on the necessity for a clear definition with both sensitivity and specificity. The Epidemiologist from the London group called CureME Research Group, Luis Nacul, showed statistically why specificity is more important than sensitivity. In other words, more specific definitions which exclude those who don't have it are better than the most "sensitive" definitions which may include both everyone who has it, but a lot of people who have other diseases or disorders as well.
Robert Miller gave a good, thorough presentation.
The level of respect the presenters convey so far is high. It appears that they have indeed reviewed the field of research literature, and that they are an intelligent, accomplished bunch. This is my impression so far.
Even Abigail Brown who was tasked with reviewing the psycho-social aspects did not say or imply that these aspects were causative, but came down clearly in the view that the data show this is a biological illness. She also is now doing research on mortality and our illness and asked that family members of anyone who has died with this contact her. Her info was on the screen at 11:19 am.