With the PACE trial coming under heavy fire from several directions, there's been a bit of a discussion about what happens if it officially sinks to the bottom of Wessely's metaphorical ocean. Most specifically, what happens to NICE?
Although the current NICE guidelines predate PACE, PACE has been reportedly used to delay a review of the NICE guidelines. So one possibility is that such a review will become more feasible or even urgent. But in that case - what support remains for CBT and GET in NICE?
In the case of GET, there are 6 studies. This thread is for discussing one of them, authored by Kathy Fulcher and Peter White. It's an older study, from 1997, thus it predates this forum and the close scrutiny warranted for biopsychosocial papers.
Although the current NICE guidelines predate PACE, PACE has been reportedly used to delay a review of the NICE guidelines. So one possibility is that such a review will become more feasible or even urgent. But in that case - what support remains for CBT and GET in NICE?
In the case of GET, there are 6 studies. This thread is for discussing one of them, authored by Kathy Fulcher and Peter White. It's an older study, from 1997, thus it predates this forum and the close scrutiny warranted for biopsychosocial papers.
Last edited: