- Messages
- 23
I moved from Seattle to a rural area of Washington State a few years ago and finally decided to switch medical providers instead of traveling an hour to see my previous GP. In July 2020 I started seeing an ARNP at my local clinic. Despite having little experience with ME/CFS she seemed interested in learning more about it and providing me with the best possible care.
The Problem
My GP even made sure to attend a CME session on CFS at the FMX 2020 conference sponsored by the American Academy of Family Physicians, to get a better understanding of what is being recommended for me. What she learned there has led to some confusion between us that I find concerning.
Prior to the conference I had told her about the major concerns of over exertion with ME/CFS. After the conference she has placed a significant emphasis on getting me to exercise more. In her words, "even if it's a 5 minute walk one day and you only increase it by half a minute the next day."
She has now told me twice that this is what she learned at the conference. She doesn't take whatever they say as gospel truth, and asked me to send her the research papers I was reading about the need to keep my heart rate low, so she can evaluate for herself. I am so appreciative of this attitude, because I am definitely not a medical professional and have no training in evaluating research.
But, I have ME/CFS and my plate at the time was too full to find those studies again. I believe this lack of follow-through also damaged my credibility in her eyes.
My Current Condition
In the months since FMX while working on some other treatments, she became concerned about my heartrate. I have since been diagnosed with Congestive Heart Failure with a 40% ejection factor in my left ventricle and an enlarged left ventricle. This results in tachycardia (racing heart beat). Prior to diagnosis I had a 30-day event monitor which recorded my high average heart rate at 160 bpm. (My low average was 70 bpm.) I was very sedentary during this time. Per a coronary angiogram my arteries are wide open and my valves work perfectly. Those were the top 2 suspected causes for my heart failure so now it's of unknown origin. My cardiologist is trying to reduce my heart rate via pharmaceuticals but this is a process that takes months. In the meantime, I was recently sent to the ED due to fluctuating blood pressure, vision blackouts, and light-headedness. We reduced some other medications but after performing orthostatic vital sign measurement and determining my heart rate increase wasn't due to dehydration, the ED Dr wants me to be evaluated for POTS. I have no idea how these 2 conditions combined would affect my anaerobic threshold.
In the meantime, both my cardiologist and my GP have encouraged me to exercise more than I currently am. Particularly cardio to strengthen my heart.
My ME/CFS History
The first time I noticed that I felt horrible the day after cardio exercise was in 2007. At that time I was also told I kept randomly passing out because my blood pressure was too low. Since I had no insurance, there was no testing performed. I had a dramatic worsening of symptoms in 2009. I was first told I likely had CFS in 2011. It officially became part of my medical records in 2016. But until there is a clear understanding of ME/CFS I am completely open to being diagnosed with and treated for other things. As long as that treatment is not contraindicated for the health of patients with ME/CFS.
In 2012, before we understood the duplicity of the PACE trials, I tried to manage my own GET program. It ended when I had my second major crash that I never fully recovered from. I created a basic exercise program that I thought I could tolerate easily based on my current levels of activity. It included treadmill work and basic free-weight muscle training 3-5x/week. I think I started a new program every week for a month. Each week I had to lower my expectations from where I was the week before because by day 3 I could barely manage half the treadmill time at a slow walk. Day 1 would be excellent, day 2 would be a struggle, and day 3 would be torture. I tried alternating cardio days and weight training days. My goal was to get a consistent level of exercise every day. My first week I took it nice and easy for days 4-7, with no time in the gym. Week 2 days 4-7 were spent going through the motions of life, but in a mental stupor. Week 3 required a couple days in bed. At week 4 I decided to embrace the push/crash cycle by picking a limited number of activities to do per week and rest in between.
I've had 2 more major crashes since then, one caused by a destination concert in 2013, the other by all-day wedding duties as a bridesmaid in 2015. Each of these crashes resulted in increasing amounts of time in recovery. Every time I pulled myself out of bed as soon as I could in order to continue living as much life as possible but didn't regain the level I had before. It's important to note here that I had other crashes that seemed as rough, but I recovered my previous level of activity. I don't know why.
In 2014, I was still participating in regular swing dancing events and rock climbing, in addition to my regular body weight/yoga practices. If I went swing dancing, something I've loved and done for 20 years, that was the only activity I did outside the home for the entire week. And I made sure to sit and rest for 20-30 minutes after every dance I did. With rock climbing I could manage to go twice per week, still manage a morning walk of 4 blocks round trip for coffee, and a couple of afternoon/evening drives. But I couldn't do a trip to the grocery store and a visit to the climbing gym on the same day. This is particularly profound because I lived in an apartment above the grocery store. I literally took an elevator to the grocery store, did my shopping, and pushed the shopping cart directly into my kitchen. I believe I could tolerate this much climbing because my individual climbs were no longer than 10 minutes, I generally did around 1 per hour, and resting/waiting time was done lounging on soft crash mats. The latter half of 2014 didn't include any climbing or dancing, but my daily walks increased to 2-3/day with up to 8 blocks round trip. I believe this was possible because of improved sleep habits, reduced interpersonal stress, and more attention to my body's moment-to-moment needs such as a slower pace or a short rest mid-walk on rough days. (Possible due to separation from my now ex-husband.)
After the 2015 wedding of friends, I have been mostly housebound. In the winter months I am mostly bedbound and zombie-like so I live for the summer months when I actually feel present again.
Given my past, I think my fear of overdoing my activity is well-founded. Especially in conjunction with the other stories of severe and very severe patients. I also believe that my history shows a clear desire and willingness to participate in exercise.
Back To The Problem
But I try to remember that my GP didn't know me then. All she knows is the obese, middle-aged woman who hasn't worked in a decade, shows up in pajamas, and keeps giving excuses for why she needs to do less activity and citing mysterious "amazing" researchers without providing any supporting documentation.
And she is trying to weigh what I'm saying against the best practices for the elements of my health that she has actually diagnosed (rather than inherited) AND what she's been taught by the American Academy of Family Physicians about the conditions I was diagnosed with prior to seeing her. If I were in her shoes, I'd pat the crazy woman on the head and say, "Don't you just have the cutest little delusions of understanding biology." But I'm a smart ass and she's a professional. And nice.
Call To Action
I've been trying to Google-fu what the AAFP recommends for ME/CFS. It doesn't show up in any of their online CME courses. I finally found a schedule for the CME sessions for FMX 2020, but there was no mention of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or ME. They did have a session called "Fatigue - A Tiresome Topic." This title does not inspire confidence in the presentation.
Doing a site search for CFS shows an article from 2012 that references the PACE trials as evidence that GET is the way to treat us. Then there is a 2013 letter from Dr. Bateman disputing the 2012 article, along with a rebuttal from some Dr. Joe Yancey. That's it. That's the most recent CFS literature available from AAFP.
I know the CDC has a pretty collection of handouts for providers that is quickly digestible. But it doesn't include any linked references. And the Feb 2021 report on ME/CFS Treatments still emphasises exercise, without any mention of being careful not to exacerbate PEM, even though the CDC's own handouts are adamant about it. (But even those handouts only include one small, easily overlooked sentence about keeping the heart rate below anaerobic levels.)
So, do you guys know of a nicely compiled body of evidence, with professional backing, that shows why my GP should follow the CDC's handouts and take those CE classes instead of the ones offered by AAFP? *Is there enough solid evidence to support that?* Or is the strongest evidence anecdotal?
How do we possibly refute what they are learning in their professional education classes without sounding like we're running around with tinfoil hats on our heads?
The Problem
My GP even made sure to attend a CME session on CFS at the FMX 2020 conference sponsored by the American Academy of Family Physicians, to get a better understanding of what is being recommended for me. What she learned there has led to some confusion between us that I find concerning.
Prior to the conference I had told her about the major concerns of over exertion with ME/CFS. After the conference she has placed a significant emphasis on getting me to exercise more. In her words, "even if it's a 5 minute walk one day and you only increase it by half a minute the next day."
She has now told me twice that this is what she learned at the conference. She doesn't take whatever they say as gospel truth, and asked me to send her the research papers I was reading about the need to keep my heart rate low, so she can evaluate for herself. I am so appreciative of this attitude, because I am definitely not a medical professional and have no training in evaluating research.
But, I have ME/CFS and my plate at the time was too full to find those studies again. I believe this lack of follow-through also damaged my credibility in her eyes.
My Current Condition
In the months since FMX while working on some other treatments, she became concerned about my heartrate. I have since been diagnosed with Congestive Heart Failure with a 40% ejection factor in my left ventricle and an enlarged left ventricle. This results in tachycardia (racing heart beat). Prior to diagnosis I had a 30-day event monitor which recorded my high average heart rate at 160 bpm. (My low average was 70 bpm.) I was very sedentary during this time. Per a coronary angiogram my arteries are wide open and my valves work perfectly. Those were the top 2 suspected causes for my heart failure so now it's of unknown origin. My cardiologist is trying to reduce my heart rate via pharmaceuticals but this is a process that takes months. In the meantime, I was recently sent to the ED due to fluctuating blood pressure, vision blackouts, and light-headedness. We reduced some other medications but after performing orthostatic vital sign measurement and determining my heart rate increase wasn't due to dehydration, the ED Dr wants me to be evaluated for POTS. I have no idea how these 2 conditions combined would affect my anaerobic threshold.
In the meantime, both my cardiologist and my GP have encouraged me to exercise more than I currently am. Particularly cardio to strengthen my heart.
My ME/CFS History
The first time I noticed that I felt horrible the day after cardio exercise was in 2007. At that time I was also told I kept randomly passing out because my blood pressure was too low. Since I had no insurance, there was no testing performed. I had a dramatic worsening of symptoms in 2009. I was first told I likely had CFS in 2011. It officially became part of my medical records in 2016. But until there is a clear understanding of ME/CFS I am completely open to being diagnosed with and treated for other things. As long as that treatment is not contraindicated for the health of patients with ME/CFS.
In 2012, before we understood the duplicity of the PACE trials, I tried to manage my own GET program. It ended when I had my second major crash that I never fully recovered from. I created a basic exercise program that I thought I could tolerate easily based on my current levels of activity. It included treadmill work and basic free-weight muscle training 3-5x/week. I think I started a new program every week for a month. Each week I had to lower my expectations from where I was the week before because by day 3 I could barely manage half the treadmill time at a slow walk. Day 1 would be excellent, day 2 would be a struggle, and day 3 would be torture. I tried alternating cardio days and weight training days. My goal was to get a consistent level of exercise every day. My first week I took it nice and easy for days 4-7, with no time in the gym. Week 2 days 4-7 were spent going through the motions of life, but in a mental stupor. Week 3 required a couple days in bed. At week 4 I decided to embrace the push/crash cycle by picking a limited number of activities to do per week and rest in between.
I've had 2 more major crashes since then, one caused by a destination concert in 2013, the other by all-day wedding duties as a bridesmaid in 2015. Each of these crashes resulted in increasing amounts of time in recovery. Every time I pulled myself out of bed as soon as I could in order to continue living as much life as possible but didn't regain the level I had before. It's important to note here that I had other crashes that seemed as rough, but I recovered my previous level of activity. I don't know why.
In 2014, I was still participating in regular swing dancing events and rock climbing, in addition to my regular body weight/yoga practices. If I went swing dancing, something I've loved and done for 20 years, that was the only activity I did outside the home for the entire week. And I made sure to sit and rest for 20-30 minutes after every dance I did. With rock climbing I could manage to go twice per week, still manage a morning walk of 4 blocks round trip for coffee, and a couple of afternoon/evening drives. But I couldn't do a trip to the grocery store and a visit to the climbing gym on the same day. This is particularly profound because I lived in an apartment above the grocery store. I literally took an elevator to the grocery store, did my shopping, and pushed the shopping cart directly into my kitchen. I believe I could tolerate this much climbing because my individual climbs were no longer than 10 minutes, I generally did around 1 per hour, and resting/waiting time was done lounging on soft crash mats. The latter half of 2014 didn't include any climbing or dancing, but my daily walks increased to 2-3/day with up to 8 blocks round trip. I believe this was possible because of improved sleep habits, reduced interpersonal stress, and more attention to my body's moment-to-moment needs such as a slower pace or a short rest mid-walk on rough days. (Possible due to separation from my now ex-husband.)
After the 2015 wedding of friends, I have been mostly housebound. In the winter months I am mostly bedbound and zombie-like so I live for the summer months when I actually feel present again.
Given my past, I think my fear of overdoing my activity is well-founded. Especially in conjunction with the other stories of severe and very severe patients. I also believe that my history shows a clear desire and willingness to participate in exercise.
Back To The Problem
But I try to remember that my GP didn't know me then. All she knows is the obese, middle-aged woman who hasn't worked in a decade, shows up in pajamas, and keeps giving excuses for why she needs to do less activity and citing mysterious "amazing" researchers without providing any supporting documentation.
And she is trying to weigh what I'm saying against the best practices for the elements of my health that she has actually diagnosed (rather than inherited) AND what she's been taught by the American Academy of Family Physicians about the conditions I was diagnosed with prior to seeing her. If I were in her shoes, I'd pat the crazy woman on the head and say, "Don't you just have the cutest little delusions of understanding biology." But I'm a smart ass and she's a professional. And nice.
Call To Action
I've been trying to Google-fu what the AAFP recommends for ME/CFS. It doesn't show up in any of their online CME courses. I finally found a schedule for the CME sessions for FMX 2020, but there was no mention of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or ME. They did have a session called "Fatigue - A Tiresome Topic." This title does not inspire confidence in the presentation.
Doing a site search for CFS shows an article from 2012 that references the PACE trials as evidence that GET is the way to treat us. Then there is a 2013 letter from Dr. Bateman disputing the 2012 article, along with a rebuttal from some Dr. Joe Yancey. That's it. That's the most recent CFS literature available from AAFP.
I know the CDC has a pretty collection of handouts for providers that is quickly digestible. But it doesn't include any linked references. And the Feb 2021 report on ME/CFS Treatments still emphasises exercise, without any mention of being careful not to exacerbate PEM, even though the CDC's own handouts are adamant about it. (But even those handouts only include one small, easily overlooked sentence about keeping the heart rate below anaerobic levels.)
So, do you guys know of a nicely compiled body of evidence, with professional backing, that shows why my GP should follow the CDC's handouts and take those CE classes instead of the ones offered by AAFP? *Is there enough solid evidence to support that?* Or is the strongest evidence anecdotal?
How do we possibly refute what they are learning in their professional education classes without sounding like we're running around with tinfoil hats on our heads?