No space makes mitochondria function fragment. When they come back to earth. They suffer something akin to CFS.
So gravity along with mitochondrial fragmentation is causing the illness.
Have you ever noticed that even different weather pressures can effect us? Why?
I'm glad they're scientists out there thinking this creatively
That is simply not true. Claiming that gravity along with mitochondrial fragmentation is causing this illness is simply something we don't know yet. Many things happen when we leave and return to earth. Far more importantly though, saying gravity has an effect on us, is something completely different to claiming that we're hypervigilant to gravity. The one is something we know, whilst the other is just a claim. One might as well argue that we have electromagnetic intolerance.
There are certainly many interesting things we can learn from space travel and as you beautifully pointed out it is awesome that Naviaux is working together with NASA. You're right, we can learn a lot about the mitochondria, but also about other things from this. As we know many astronauts have reactivated EBV, yet they never develop ME/CFS, what can we learn from this? Personally I'm probably a bit biased when it comes to Naviaux solving this, because of his age, not his knowledge. But if he's surrounded great collaborators and former students around him my bias could be worthless.
I don't really understand your weather reference. Gravity is not influenced by weather pressures. As to why we feel sensitive to many things including sounds, light and pressure is something we don't know. At least I don't have any answers for this.
So you believe that we can test for IBS by just sending a buch of people on a VR-rollercoaster and checking for correlations or doing something similar? Because how else would CBT cure us from our graviational intolerance? That truely is an interesting and especially testable concept.
I agree with you, I also love it if scientists think creatively and have completely new concepts and come up with theories nobody has ever thought of before. But to me the IBS-gravity paper doesn't fit that description at all. In my opinion it just makes bold claims without a proper thought behind them, maybe I understand too little. Do you think a physicst would be able to suggest such a poorly thought out theory? Maybe, I'm wrong and this was just a random shower thought by Spiegel and he's since tried to establish a proper theory and even tried to validate it with experiments.
We certainly shouldn't leave any stone unturned, but does that mean we have to turn every stone as soon as it appears?
PS: I'm not trying to attack you on your own thread. I'm generally very curious about any theory and want to have a friendly discussion.