ljimbo423
Senior Member
- Messages
- 4,705
- Location
- United States, New Hampshire
As we have seen from the above information I quoted, which comes from research by Drs Cheney, Peterson and Bell, your medical suggestion about PCR testing looks plain wrong.
I think Robert Naviaux sums it very well here. As a world renown virologist of 30 years and a leading ME/CFS researcher that has worked with ME/CFS patients.
I trust his judgement far more than the doctors or researchers you have quoted. His view is one of the many reasons why I don't trust viral or bacterial titer testing in ME/CFS and why I think PCR and/or other testing is absolutely crucial!
Titer testing in ME/CFS is just not conclusive in my opinion, along with Doctor Naviauxs' and it appears Ron Davis' as well. The testing that Ron Davis did for viruses in ME/CFS, that showed no increase in viruses compared to controls, in the severely ill, was PCR testing.
I'm sure with all the wide range of tests Ron had available and all the incredibly intelligent doctors and researchers he has surrounding him he chose PCR because it's the most reliable, over titer testing.
This is a quote from Naviaux for anyone else that reads this-
Third, latent and reactivated viral and bacterial infections can occur, but in the case of ME/CFS that has lasted for more than 6 months, this may be the exception rather than the rule.
Some doctors and scientists have not done a good job at educating patients and other scientists about the difference between serological evidence of infection in the form of antibodies like IgM and IgG, and physical evidence of viral replication like PCR amplification of viral RNA or DNA, or bacterial DNA.
We have learned in our autism studies with Dr. Judy Van de Water that supertiters of antibodies do not mean new or reactivated viral replication. Supertiters of IgG antibodies mean that the balancing T-cell and NK cell mediated immune activity is decreased. This is a functional kind of immune deficiency that causes an unbalanced increase in antibodies.
What Naviaux is clearly saying is, that high bacterial or viral titers in ME/CFS is NOT conclusive evidence of a bacterial or viral reactivation. What it usually means is the immune system dysfunction in CFS (the balancing T-cell and NK cell mediated immune activity is decreased) and causing the high titers, not a reactivation.
Last edited by a moderator: