I haven't updated it with recent data, but here is my previous analysis:
http://forums.phoenixrising.me/index.php?threads/what-is-wrong-with-this-graph.18395/#post-279826
Note that the NIH has a (never imposed) mandate to award research funding based on societal impact (typicaly measured using DALYs). The reason why it is not accounted for is because the DALY studies including the recent one funded by the Gates Foundation chose to ignore CFS or ME. The figures I am using are from the Australian DALY study (adjusted for US prevalence), which is the only study to actually bother.
CFS/ME is underfunded by a magnitude of order (I used a logarithmic graph), which is to say that the funding needs to be increased by something like 20 times for its funding to be on par with
asthma or
depression. Underfunded by a magnitude of order means that a precise prevalence measurement is less relevant - 0.1% still means the funding has to increase by over 10x to be on par.