WPI has stated clearly that the cash flow from the patients will in part go to the research arm. How that's done if they're legally separate, I don't know. I assume they have figured out all the paper loopholes. I assume that's why insurance doesn't work as a model--they can't just generate income to cover treatment, they need to fund research (or feel they need to).
Personally it puts me off, that unable to get grants, they are asking patients to pony up. If translational medicine means, Patients pay top dollar out of pocket...well...
But at least they should be clear about exactly what the research projects are, what the "N" will be (if possible, ie how many are being studied), project their costs, and what percentage of patients' money will fund each study. If that's not transparent, it doesn't seem right to me.
At this point, since ARVs have been underwhelming, and since any other treatments are available from other docs who do take insurance, people who go there are probably above all donating their cash and bodies to the future, in the hopes that WPI will come up with something new or different.
I would love to know why Peterson left, though.