Bob
Senior Member
- Messages
- 16,455
- Location
- England (south coast)
And then he spent the rest of the webinar talking about his incredibly complex, sophisticated and cutting-edge biomedical study.Dr. Nath stated he isn't interested in somatization and doesn't want to play psychological games.
The individuals in charge of this study caused this problem by including doctors who have written or stated that ME/CFS is psychological, plus added a psych control group (still no good explanation why).
Edit: Sorry, I'm getting confused and talking about the Lyme control group, which I initially thought was a good idea.
They're scientists, not politicians! I think we just have to work with what's been made available to us. Nath had made himself available to us, so can't we just communicate and work with him? He seems like a decent chap to me.I think to possibly make things better they need to have someone who understands the history address patient concerns in a thoughtful, compassionate way. ME/CFS has a unique and troubled history that requires a certain level of sensitivity.
Last edited: