Does anyone here NOT have EBV, HHV-6, or CMV?

morgan_25

Senior Member
Messages
133
Question. This is what my results look like. For whatever reason every time I see someone else’s results it shows EXTREMELY different numbers, like there are different kinds of EBV tests, but I’m the only one with this weird test.
 

Attachments

  • C2609947-6B40-4ADE-8F05-207A06FC0D11.jpeg
    C2609947-6B40-4ADE-8F05-207A06FC0D11.jpeg
    2.3 MB · Views: 28

sometexan84

Senior Member
Messages
1,242
Or 3 or 4, I’ve lost count. All negative.

But I’m beginning to question the value of an “active” test. The doctors make a big deal over them, “oh your test is negative, so your fine...”
It's up to you, but tons and tons of people were cured from Dr. Lerner's treatment after being diagnosed w/ what you have. IgM = active, primary, acute.... EA IgG = 80%+ of the time, it's a reactivation. But it's more than an 80% chance in your case, based on the numbers in your collective test results.
 

sometexan84

Senior Member
Messages
1,242
And you’re saying that it could have been a false negative?
That is very unlikely. But I haven't seen your actual labwork. From what you're describing, it's not a false positive. But again, I'd have to actually see the numbers.
 

sometexan84

Senior Member
Messages
1,242
This is interesting because I had a PCR test done right after my EBV test showed I was positive for active EBV, but my PCR test came back negative as wel.
Or 3 or 4, I’ve lost count. All negative.

But I’m beginning to question the value of an “active” test. The doctors make a big deal over them, “oh your test is negative, so your fine...”

Ok, so, here's the deal. PCR is accurate, it is. But the Early Antigen (EA) IgG is what you should use.

The thing is PCR testing is newer. And the cut-off values for positive/negative is very different. There's not really a standard protocol. So, while the PCR is good, the standard diagnosis is not.
 

EddieB

Senior Member
Messages
638
Location
Northern southern California
It's up to you, but tons and tons of people were cured from Dr. Lerner's treatment after being diagnosed w/ what you have. IgM = active, primary, acute.... EA IgG = 80%+ of the time, it's a reactivation. But it's more than an 80% chance in your case, based on the numbers in your collective test results.

Your story is encouraging, thanks for sharing. Do you offer coaching services as well? 😁
I sent my immunologist info on Lerner, Montoya, and Powell. I’ll need her to agree to an ongoing supply of valtrex. I’m running out of hope as well as things to try...
 

sometexan84

Senior Member
Messages
1,242
Question. This is what my results look like. For whatever reason every time I see someone else’s results it shows EXTREMELY different numbers, like there are different kinds of EBV tests, but I’m the only one with this weird test.
Yes, that is for sure an Acute, Primary EBV Infection.
 

morgan_25

Senior Member
Messages
133
Your story is encouraging, thanks for sharing. Do you offer coaching services as well? 😁
I sent my immunologist info on Lerner, Montoya, and Powell. I’ll need her to agree to an ongoing supply of valtrex. I’m running out of hope as well as things to try...
I have had people recommend Valtrex to me as well.
 

morgan_25

Senior Member
Messages
133
I guess it could be either. But the way you describe it, if you had symptoms from the get-go, then I would call it an acute infection, a persistent one.
Yeah that’s true. Do you know anything about the impact of EBV on our organs? I’m just curious cause around April when it got really bad I started having severe pain in my lower left back and all of MRIs and such are all clear. So, of course just like everything else they never figured out what it was and it hasn’t gotten any better.
 

EddieB

Senior Member
Messages
638
Location
Northern southern California
But because I’ve had it for long wouldn’t be chronic and not acute?

Just my opinion, but I suspect that in the long term cases, the virus has hid itself in the tissues, and may or may not show up active in serum.

That would be a good question, has someone that has been sick with symptoms for years, suddenly turned up a positive PCR?
 

morgan_25

Senior Member
Messages
133
Just my opinion, but I suspect that in the long term cases, the virus has hid itself in the tissues, and may or may not show up active in serum.

That would be a good question, has someone that has been sick with symptoms for years, suddenly turned up a positive PCR?
That’s exactly what one of my CFS friends mentioned to me actually. She seemed to think that there is a possibility that it has progressed so much that it may be in the tissues, so it’s not showing up on PCR. I don’t know how possible that is but it makes sense, however I would think that if I still test positive of the EBV tests, that I should test positive on PCR? I’m not sure, I’ve only ever had one PCR test done before.
 
Back