Hoosierfans
Senior Member
- Messages
- 408
Hey all,
Could use some expertise from the folks here who are MUCH smarter than me (@Hip, @Freddd , @Learner1 ) or anyone else who wants to weigh in! I've got two practitioners telling me very contrary opinions and I can't tell who is right!
In the late fall, I was tested for Wilson's disease. My copper serum was below range, ceruloplasmin was below range, and 24 hour urine copper was low (the latter ruled out Wilsons). My integrative doc / internist opined that I have a straight copper deficiency and need to supplement with copper (copper gluconate working up to 16 mg per day in order to give 2 mg elemental copper). (Haven't started it yet as we've been working on other things). The last time I tried copper supplementation was 3-4 years ago and it made my nerve burning and anxiety worse.
Today I had a consult with a metals and minerals specialist who, based on a Hair Metals and Minerals test, and my previous copper tests, opined that I had a copper toxicity...and that the LAST thing I should do is supplement with copper. That test is attached. She mentioned that "of the 12 markers we look for for copper deficiency, you have 8" (but the only one I caught was my low potassium level.
The only other clue is my reaction to molybdenum -- higher doses REALLY increase my symptoms (each practitioner points to this as justifying their conclusion as it chelates copper)
My symptoms are severe anxiety and depression, nerve burning / neuropathy all over my arms, legs, face and brain, fatigue, cognitive issues, dizziness and lightheaded. Mostly bed and housebound.
Her plan of treatment would include building up my ceruloplasmin through Boron (I am low), taurine, Vitamin A which should, in turn, get copper to where it needs to be. And, we would correct an iodine deficiency which I have.
Can anyone weigh in? It's frustrating to have two opposed conclusions seemingly come from the same data. Thanks!!
Could use some expertise from the folks here who are MUCH smarter than me (@Hip, @Freddd , @Learner1 ) or anyone else who wants to weigh in! I've got two practitioners telling me very contrary opinions and I can't tell who is right!
In the late fall, I was tested for Wilson's disease. My copper serum was below range, ceruloplasmin was below range, and 24 hour urine copper was low (the latter ruled out Wilsons). My integrative doc / internist opined that I have a straight copper deficiency and need to supplement with copper (copper gluconate working up to 16 mg per day in order to give 2 mg elemental copper). (Haven't started it yet as we've been working on other things). The last time I tried copper supplementation was 3-4 years ago and it made my nerve burning and anxiety worse.
Today I had a consult with a metals and minerals specialist who, based on a Hair Metals and Minerals test, and my previous copper tests, opined that I had a copper toxicity...and that the LAST thing I should do is supplement with copper. That test is attached. She mentioned that "of the 12 markers we look for for copper deficiency, you have 8" (but the only one I caught was my low potassium level.
The only other clue is my reaction to molybdenum -- higher doses REALLY increase my symptoms (each practitioner points to this as justifying their conclusion as it chelates copper)
My symptoms are severe anxiety and depression, nerve burning / neuropathy all over my arms, legs, face and brain, fatigue, cognitive issues, dizziness and lightheaded. Mostly bed and housebound.
Her plan of treatment would include building up my ceruloplasmin through Boron (I am low), taurine, Vitamin A which should, in turn, get copper to where it needs to be. And, we would correct an iodine deficiency which I have.
Can anyone weigh in? It's frustrating to have two opposed conclusions seemingly come from the same data. Thanks!!