Conants Talk At ILADS by C. Cairns

shannah

Senior Member
Messages
1,429
from Chris Cairns:

Sunday, October 17, 2010
ILADS conference 2010 - Dr. Marcus Conant
The Patient Advocate came to the ILADS conference in Jersey City, NJ to hear several talks. The ILADS organizers departed from past practices and invited five non-ILADS members to give presentations. In the PAs estimation, this is in reaction to the changed ME/CFS topography since October 2009. There is no other explanation for it. Dr. Burrascano, a major lyme doctor, obviously engineered having these HIV/XMRV/Infection Disease doctors give presentations. Things are changing at the ILADS conference.

The Patient Advocate paid his conference fee to hear three presentations. Foremost among these was Dr. Marcus Conant, a relative newcomer to the ME/CFS field at the age of 73. If you want to learn more about Dr Conant look here. The Patient Advocate was not disappointed. This guy is great. We will be seeing more of Dr. Conant as XMRV moves relentlessly along.

Dr. Conant gave a talk entitled Lessons - learned from HIV. Dr. Conant, who was in the front lines of the AIDS diagnosis and treatment, is no shrinking violet. In the early 1980's he was one of a very few doctors in San Francisco who were willing to deal with doomed patients - often dead in weeks or months. Dr. Conant speaks his mind and he does not flinch. He began his talk by referencing the plague of 1348 and drew parallels, past and present, to it. He spoke in an impassioned fashion of the advocacy problems of trying to defeat ignorance, and how to move the agenda forward. His presentation had very humorous even caustically absurd - moments to it, indicating the complex and emphathetic nature of his rangy personality. His central recommendation is to define the cause and to focus the research. In doing this Dr. Conant recommended not groveling, not fawning, not eliciting sympathy - just moving forward with clarity and determination. He encouraged activism and self-reliance regarding research, saying Congress is your last resource, not the first. Dr. Conant obviously does not get sidetracked or waste his time talking to non-helpful individuals. On the other hand he urges efforts toward inclusion - not fracturing - by trying to bring your adversaries to your side of the issues. The talk was deeply emotional and Dr. Conant, an unknown to most of the attendees, made a strong connection, as he was given a spontaneous standing ovation by the entire 200+ people in the hall.

The Patient Advocate has read on the internet that Dr. Conant has left his practice in San Francisco and come to New York because of an interest in this new retrovirus named XMRV. This was confirmed in conversation with him. The Patient Advocate surmises that Dr. Conant thinks that XMRV is a potential player in ME/CFS. Dr. Conant presents lyme and its affiliate, ME/CFS, as an infectious disease. With this in mind the Patient Advocate sees Dr. Conant as an advocate for ME/CFS research and treatment. At a minimum Dr. Conants expertise can be involved in upcoming treatment trials of antiretroviral drugs in ME/CFS patients.

The atmosphere of the ILADS conference was diametrically opposed to the CFSAC Science Day, which should be canceled. Much of this was due to the ILADS presentations of these four pro XMRV-related infectious disease physicians. There was none of the self-satisfied, politically-motivated vapors that filled the HHS conference room. The Patient Advocate saw Science Day as an attempt to put the breaks on further revelations about the connection of XMRV. The PA has to ask, why is this?

It becomes increasing obvious to the Patient Advocate that the FDA and others are really freaked out over the blood supply, and their responsibility for this. The FDA is going to be exposed to insurance claims coming from those who have been made sick through transfusions. This is a repeat of the AIDS epidemic. It is in their interest to string this out, until the Blood working group reports - and longer.

Other reasons for these delaying tactic were advanced to me by a knowledgeable and insightful friend:

Where the money has not simply disappeared, or been poured down a rathole, it went to fund the amateur psychiatry of Stephen Straus or Bill Reeves. (Nobody seemed concerned at the time about them publishing work far outside their areas of expertise, except, as always Lenny Jason.) Avoiding exposure of this, with concomitant collateral damage to institutions, and future funding, is the first priority of those in charge. As second goal is to wrest control from WPI, so new research serves to provide more funding for the same institutions who screwed around, wasted time and treated funding for this subject as a kind of slush fund to cover miscellaneous expenses not covered by other allegations.

A third goal is to avoid committing the federal government to paying disability, or diagnostic and treatment costs, for another few million people. Current expenditures for HIV run around $1,000 per person per month -- for life. Since we are talking about another retrovirus and some of the same drugs, costs for treating ME/CFS are unlikely to be lower. Taking on a new $1,000,000,000/month liability was not in the Congressional plans for medical reform. Projected funding is already inadequate without this."


Yesterday was Conant, Montoya and Brewer. Today it is Mikovits.

http://cfspatientadvocate.blogspot....PyaUlhAFpxLxaE-1dK7sX78g#c1121152671190801980
 

Sasha

Fine, thank you
Messages
17,863
Location
UK
Very interesting (you are posting lots of interesting stuff today, Shannah!) - Dr Conant sounds great and if he is charging in to help us, that's fantastic. He sounds amazing.
 

shannah

Senior Member
Messages
1,429
Sasha,

It was just all sitting on my Facebook page waiting to be posted. That's the only thing I use Facebook for - to gather the latest.

It took me longer to look around and see if these pieces had already been posted somewhere on PR. So hopefully these aren't duplicate entries!

Good news about Dr. Conant for sure. I had read a few months ago he made the crossover from HIV to XMRV and switched coasts but haven't heard much since. Sounds like that's about's to change. Hopefully that's about to change! He sounds like he could be a very valuable asset for our movement with loads of experience.
 

Sasha

Fine, thank you
Messages
17,863
Location
UK
Yes, he sounds very politically savvy and the sort of personality that can forge strong links with people and get them into our camp. It's great to have people with experience of the HIV/AIDS struggle taking up our case. It's so much about the politics as well as the science.
 
Back