Here's the WPI's comparative tables, which show just how far off the mark of ''replication" studies like Singh's and others really were.
Little wonder why they are getting negative results.
http://treatingxmrv.blogspot.com/2011/06/comparison-of-methods-for-detection-and.html?spref=fb
Little wonder why they are getting negative results.
http://treatingxmrv.blogspot.com/2011/06/comparison-of-methods-for-detection-and.html?spref=fb