Pyrrhus
Senior Member
- Messages
- 4,172
- Location
- U.S., Earth
Cardiopulmonary, metabolic, and perceptual responses during exercise in ME/CFS: A Multi-site Clinical Assessment of ME/CFS sub-study (Cook et al., 2022)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265315
A study that provides more evidence of exercise intolerance in ME, and evidence that this exercise intolerance is not due to deconditioning.
But remember: exercise intolerance is NOT the same as PEM/exertion intolerance!
Abstract:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265315
A study that provides more evidence of exercise intolerance in ME, and evidence that this exercise intolerance is not due to deconditioning.
But remember: exercise intolerance is NOT the same as PEM/exertion intolerance!
Abstract:
Background
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has demonstrated clinical utility in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). However, to what extent exercise responses are independent of, or confounded by, aerobic fitness remains unclear.
Purpose
To characterize and compare exercise responses in ME/CFS and controls with and without matching for aerobic fitness.
Methods
As part of the Multi-site Clinical Assessment of ME/CFS (MCAM) study, 403 participants (n = 214 ME/CFS; n = 189 controls), across six ME/CFS clinics, completed ramped cycle ergometry to volitional exhaustion. Metabolic, heart rate (HR), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured. Ventilatory equivalent (,
), metrics of ventilatory efficiency, and chronotropic incompetence (CI) were calculated. Exercise variables were compared using Hedges’ g effect size with 95% confidence intervals. Differences in cardiopulmonary and perceptual features during exercise were analyzed using linear mixed effects models with repeated measures for relative exercise intensity (20–100% peak
). Subgroup analyses were conducted for 198 participants (99 ME/CFS; 99 controls) matched for age (±5 years) and peak
(~1 ml/kg/min-1).![]()
Results
Ninety percent of tests (n = 194 ME/CFS, n = 169 controls) met standard criteria for peak effort. ME/CFS responses during exercise (20–100% peak) were significantly lower for ventilation, breathing frequency, HR, measures of efficiency, and CI and significantly higher for
,
and RPE (p<0.05adjusted). For the fitness-matched subgroup, differences remained for breathing frequency,
,
, and RPE (p<0.05adjusted), and higher tidal volumes were identified for ME/CFS (p<0.05adjusted). Exercise responses at the gas exchange threshold, peak, and for measures of ventilatory efficiency (e.g.,
) were generally reflective of those seen throughout exercise (i.e., 20–100%).![]()
Conclusion
Compared to fitness-matched controls, cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in ME/CFS are characterized by inefficient exercise ventilation and augmented perception of effort. These data highlight the importance of distinguishing confounding fitness effects to identify responses that may be more specifically associated with ME/CFS.