OI understand the difficult terrain but think we need to make clear that the world is moving On - current day metabolomic research and IOM report etc The BPS model puts too much emphasis on behaviour as modifying factor and by Definition the psychological and social in the title are greater than biological when for many with ME, PS factors are very secondary Or irrelevant. The BPS is applied to ME to keep it in its place, and frame it as a behavioural. Look at the trashy research the BPS lot produce and what they actually think of the illness. If the people at NICE are saying it's a tragedy biomedical research has not been more which is why NGs were on the static list, then journals and medical schools need to think on the role their CFS name and umbrella, BPS CBT model and MUS lumping has contributed to that tragedy. Again, emphasing severity, multi systemic nature, high pain levels and longevity will help to counter the treatable fatigue narratives.