Ok.
But if the CDC no longer list CBT or GET as treatment, that fact should be able to be listed (as but one example)
Anyway, I'll post in that thread. Thanks
Massive changes may be a good idea if you can back up each and every of the changes by sources that are seen as credible by others who've been editing the article.
If not, small changes may work better - the most important first!
they're possible going to revert your changes, mate... wikipedia is not a democracy, and I even thin they might have an agenda. The "chronic fatigue syndrome" is specially suspicious. Good luck anyway!
Probably a long shot but might be worth investigating if any more could be added to the sections on the PACE trial now that so many more published peer reviewed papers can be cited.
We need to gain control of that page and maybe we can put the IOM report stuff instead. As a community this is crazy. That is a person what is the formal procedure to take control???
It dones't matter if the person changes it back. We have nothing but people with time here. GO ahead and create the content, then we can enter the war and just change it back we will outnumber this person believe me.
We are winning the PACE fight we shouldn't stop here.
If any one is thinking of helping out on Wikipedia there is currently a small but important change that is being discussed about the CDC's statement that "There is no cure or approved treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)." There is opposition to including 'No Approved treatment' on the Wikipedia page. You can contribute at the bottom of "The CDC guide has been updated." on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chronic_fatigue_syndrome