this refers to patients who come to see him, so clearly there's gene expression and who knows how many other correlates with this polymorphism with this qualification.
Makes no difference. He is attributing symptoms to the presence of the SNP but there is no evidence that the SNP causes the problems. It is a very common SNP so undoubtedly a number of patients would have it. Nor does it have anything to do with so-called expression of the SNP. It is part of the gene and is expressed when the gene is expressed.
@Valentijn has covered the prevalence and the fact that most of the SNPs that Yasko makes claims about are pretty much irrelevant. Many of them are synonymous - ie they cause no change to the protein product of the gene, so have no effect.
I'll just mention too the claims this SNP affects the backwards reaction of MTHFR which in turn is involved in regeneration of BH4, along with the related claim that BH4 gets used up in processing ammonia.
Both claims are incorrect. The first is based on misreading of a research paper which had created experimental conditions to make the enzyme run backwards, using qBH2 as a reactant (not the same as BH2). There is no evidence that MTHFR runs backwards in the body, nor does it act to regenerate BH4. Two other enzymes do that - DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase) which converts BH2 to BH4, and DHPR (dihydropteridine reductase) which converts qBH2 to BH4.
BH4 has no role whatsoever in the urea cycle, where ammonia is processed. Yasko seems to have completely misread the NOS reaction, which does involve BH4 and somehow conflated it with the urea cycle. There are a couple of shared reactants but they are two separate metabolic pathways.
What minerals were depleted and how did you test for them
Determining mineral status can be very difficult. In my case I determined empirically that I responded mainly to boron, though later addition of calcium, molybdenum and manganese also seemed to help restore the beneficial effect of B12/folate (which had petered out).
I interpreted the positive response as meaning these minerals had become depleted, though I can't say for sure that this is the reason. I did have lowish boron, molybdenum and manganese on a hair test; true calcium status is very difficult to determine. The only real sign of lowish calcium status I had was high 1,25 diOH vit D to 25 OH D ratio
Freddd found he developed severe copper depletion. He interpreted this and other trace mineral depletion as part of refeeding syndrome. It is a reasonable interpretation of the phenomenon though there are so many unknowns around why and how active B12/folate really works that it is not possible to say for sure.