MeSci
ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
- Messages
- 8,231
- Location
- Cornwall, UK
This is in similar vein to this thread from last year.
I wonder to what extent this p0licy arose from former advisor David Nutt and his inconvenient truth that policy on recreational drugs doesn't work, and that they should be decriminalised. After parting company with the government he proceeded to lobby strongly for his preferred, evidence-based policy.
Such 'muzzling' could adversely affect us - if a government-funded study finds strong evidence that an expensive treatment works for us, or if unequivocal evidence were found that CBT/GET caused serious harm, for example, and that doesn't suit the politicians...
Scientists attack their 'muzzling' by government
State-funded scientists could be prevented from lobbying for change in their field under Cabinet Office proposals
Senior scientists have denounced a potential move to “muzzle” colleagues whose findings are disliked by the government.
The proposal – announced by the Cabinet Office earlier this month – would block researchers who receive government grants from using their results to lobby for changes to laws or regulations.
I wonder to what extent this p0licy arose from former advisor David Nutt and his inconvenient truth that policy on recreational drugs doesn't work, and that they should be decriminalised. After parting company with the government he proceeded to lobby strongly for his preferred, evidence-based policy.
Such 'muzzling' could adversely affect us - if a government-funded study finds strong evidence that an expensive treatment works for us, or if unequivocal evidence were found that CBT/GET caused serious harm, for example, and that doesn't suit the politicians...