Jonathan Edwards
"Gibberish"
- Messages
- 5,256
Thanks again and I understand not being able to give out specific information. ( dates would be nice though )
Regarding the immunological side of the condition, I read in another thread you believe that may represent 60% of patients. Can you elaborate on how you came to that figure ?
Also, is there any attribute that can be linked to the immunological side of the condition ie specific symptoms, onset, duration, severity etc. ( From the phase 2 norwegian study there doesn't appear to be but just wondering if anyone has looked at or might look at this.)
For the non immunological side - is there any work on this to understand it better ? Are there two different diseases at play here ?
Thanks very much yet again!
The 60% figure comes from the Norwegian phase 2 trial response rate. So far it has been hard to relate this to any specific clinical features. There is a mass of work out there on all sorts of aspects but not so much in the way of replicated results. Probably the best thing is to browse through the back threads on papers that we have discussed on PR. That is the main way I have learned about the disease.