• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Testing Strategies for Detection (XMRV)

Jemal

Senior Member
Messages
1,031
This publication, from 2 FDA researchers, discusses the different testing methods that have been done to detect XMRV and what pitfalls to look out for.

Received 10 March 2011; Revised 18 May 2011; Accepted 10 June 2011

When XMRV was first identified in PC patients in 2006, it did not get much public attention until a Science paper published in 2009 reported its detection in a majority (67%) of CFS patients and about 4% of healthy Americans. In this report, XMRV was shown to be infectious and could be isolated from peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma, indicating that it is the first gamma retrovirus that infects humans and may be associated with human diseases. Furthermore, if confirmed, it was thought that millions of persons worldwide may harbor the new virus and thus pose a serious concern to public health and the safety of blood transfusion and organ transplantation. These findings greatly stimulated the interest of scientists in academia and government agencies to address both public health and scientific concerns about the newly identified retrovirus and its possible association with human diseases.

However, the studies that followed the original publications have yielded conflicting findings and generated more controversy than consensus about XMRV detection and its potential disease association. In 2010, Lo et al reported the detection of polytropic MLV-like sequences in 87% of CFS patients. MLV-like sequences are different from, but very similar to XMRV. The detection of polytropic MLV in CFS patients suggested that XMRV may be only one of an apparent cluster of MLV-like viruses identified in patient specimens. In this review, we describe and summarize the various testing methods and assays that have been employed for detection of XMRV and /or MLV-like virus infection in the studies that have been published until the present time.

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/av/aip/281425/

p.s. glad the forum is back, I was going through withdrawal symptoms.
 

Jemal

Senior Member
Messages
1,031
I think the conclusion says it all. The game is still on...

Currently there are no commercially available, FDA approved/licensed tests for detection of XMRV or other MLV-related human retroviruses. Standards for the diagnosis of XMRV or MLV-related retrovirus infection based on laboratory test methods have not been established. The relative sensitivity and specificity of various assay methodologies and strategies (i.e. NAT, serology, culture) have not been determined and standards for assay performance have not yet been established. The use of multiple testing methodologies may be required because of the biology of the viruses, such as transient viremia and relatively low immune response observed in the Macaque model. In order to avoid false positive detection, mouse DNA contamination should be carefully examined and excluded.
 

Enid

Senior Member
Messages
3,309
Location
UK
Quite agree Jemal - "the game is on" - resolving detection methods seems fundamental at this stage.