Resistant starch is a very good idea. I have incorporated this for some time through various foods, but not in the same quantities as you report. I've also never taken unmodified potato starch, but I am intrigued by the idea of using this method to introduce large quantities of RS. Actually, I think galactooligosaccharide (GOS) may be the ideal substrate for Bifidobacterial growth. Have you considered this. A while back I tried to get some bifido-sourced GOS, but it was only available in the UK. There are other non-bifido-derived sources of GOS, though.
I think RS could be very effective, but I believe most here would benefit from the introduction of species that they are lacking. The ongoing supplementation of these organisms will need to continue until the conditions in the bowel are such that these organisms can predominate. Unfortunately, one of the limiting factors in repopulating the intestinal microbiome is going to be one's tolerance to the fatigue and inflammatory response created by the displacement of these organisms. Everyone I know that has pursued my suggestions have eventually experienced this. If you throw down the ideal substrate and start putting in huge numbers of these organisms, as is the case when you culture your own bacteria without competing organisms, there will be some negative consequences.
I had never heard of GOS until you mentioned it. I am very interested in comparing its efficacy to RS. Both substances appear to be front runners in terms of dramatically increasing bifido populations.
The fatigue response you speak of is exactly what I experienced starting the RS. I improved in many other metrics however. I occasionally have days now where my body feels amazing but on the whole I am more fatigued than before. For a full report on my experience thus far with RS please read my post on my other thread here:
http://forums.phoenixrising.me/index.php?threads/candida-biofilms-theory-protocol.25472/page-4#post-426080
I do think the nitrogen problem may be a core issue in ME/CFS and it is reflective of dysbiosis. For many this does not become apparent until cysteine levels rise or pathogenic organisms involved in the nitrogen cycle are displaced. Cysteine metabolism is closely paired to nitrogen metabolism in humans and with apologies to Ms. Yasko, I think the influence of cysteine is not what she has hypothesized. Bifidobacteria positively contribute to denitrification, and their collective impact in humans is unlike any other organism. (SBO's are generally pretty efficient at this as well but they will not predominate).
I was wondering if you could expand on this subject of dentrification. What is it you exactly mean by that? The reason I'm curious is that a while ago I started taking a
new NOx supplement from AOR that is loaded with nitrates and nitrites. If you look through AOR's site, they drop obscure clues as to their "secret" formula and it appears to be a bacteria of some kind that interacts with these compounds which promotes health by producing NO. I seemed to feel better taking the supplement but can't tell if its placebo or not.
Let me know if you have tried GOS and how your experiment is going. Also, what sort of ammonia symptoms have you experienced.
The ammonia symptoms were quite sever considering how drastic the relief was when I initially began taking yucca. It's hard to describe, but there was this nervous system and muscular tension along my entire spine. It felt inflamed and like it was seizing up. There was also a subtle background pain I had largely learned to repress. I would wake up in the morning feeling like I had been hit by a semi-truck, and my entire body was stiff. Sleeping was more exhausting than rejuvenating and my dreams were filled with anxiety. I couldn't eat within 3 hours of waking as it felt my digestive system had no energy to move anything at all, least of all absorb nutrients from food. I felt like a zombie for the first half of the day and was obviously fatigued and had severe brain fog.
The yucca gave me about a 70% improvement in symptoms. I still have most of them now, but the severity is drastically less. With the RS now I occasionally have a day where they seem completely gone (so 100% improvement), so I am very hopeful at this point. Overall I feel like I'm at the 80% mark but frustratingly it fluctuates quite a bit. Also I have lived with this type of symptoms for most of my life, so I'm not even sure what "normal" feels like.
I am in the process of hopefully getting some GOS sourced from Bifidus, so I will test this hypothesis against PS.
I am confused by your statement. Do the bifido make GOS?? I tried looking for GOS and it's really hard to find. What are your thoughts on :
http://www.bimuno.com/ ? I would really like to try GOS but want to make sure I am getting one from the correct source. Do you have any references? And where are you hopefully getting yours?
I don't know who Bill Lagakos is, but this is very much on point. Thanks for linking. It looks like he has looked at quite a few studies comparing efficacy of PS to GOS. If his conclusions are accurate, both seem to be pretty effective at raising Bifidus counts. Of course this does not resolve the question about substrate specificity and the possibility that one is less likely to encourage the growth of more pathogenic organisms than the other, something that may only be relevant to a subset. (I really hate being in that subset)
In terms of specificity it seems that RS does quite well. If you look at Tim's n=1 experiment he has less of the pathogenic proteobacteria than anyone else in the comparison table!
http://freetheanimal.com/2013/11/resistant-american-comparison.html
In those terms I feel safer taking RS than GOS because at least with the RS there is some evidence indicating it's specificity. I agree in=1 is not exactly great but its better than nothing. Anecdotally also the vast majority of people taking RS (in the thousands) are reporting major improvements. If someone were to break out with E.Coli or something nasty I think we would have heard by now. In fact resistant starch has been used as an effective treatment to treat cholera. It has been shown in a lab that 98% of cholera bacteria will detach from an agar substrate and bind to the resistant starch for elimination. (
refrence) I also read somewhere that cold potatoes were prescribed in the 1800's for digestive ailments along with treating Dysentery. So RS has a record of being useful to treat some pretty nasty conditions going back quite a ways.
I had heard about the effect of cocoa flavanols, and have raw cocoa beans here at my desk. They have other compounds, though, that make this somewhat tricky. Their bitter taste is a clue that they are rich in alkaloids. There are lots of pairing in nature of plant compounds to protect us. You need Bifidobacteria to assist with the metabolism of alkaloids, so the cocoa bean is rich in antioxidants and stimulates Bifidobacterial growth. Brilliant engineering. Strangely enough, the friend who brought the cocoa beans to me has gotten a number of people "hooked" on these raw beans; too bitter for me, but they chew them throughout the day. Perhaps those who perceive less bitterness have an inherently superior or acquired ability to metabolize alkaolids
I am very interested in also trying these cocoa flavanols after reading this blog post:
http://caloriesproper.com/?p=1583
I found one company that claims to have a superior supplement that preserves all the flavanols in cocoa that I am interested in trying for its bifidogenic properties.
https://www.cocoavia.com/ The parent company
Mars Inc sued Life Extension Foundation and Naturex for 9 patents infringements in its cocoa flavnaol production. If people are trying to steal the formula it makes me think there is something to it and I now want to try it.
The
research they tout is kinda funny to me in that they are promoting it for it's cardiovascular benefits with no mention of it's supposed bifidogenic properties. Makes me think they don't even know how or why it has those beneficial effects. LOL. If only the company read these forums.
I had some organic cocoa at home but it is "dutch-processed" which apparently destroys 90%+ of the flavanols...too bad.
Also wondering about Pectin. According to this
one study it reigned supreme in terms of its bifidogenic effects. Could it be better than RS and GOS?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23831725
The full paper can be found here:
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=foodscidiss
I didn't read through the whole thing, so I didn't examine their methodology or quantities used, duration,etc. they were trying to study obesity...but the results table appears to be on pg.76. Also they didn't test GOS but Pectin appears to be about 3x better than RS-2 in terms of affecting bifido populations.
Also while not a comparitive study this one also touts apple.
Effect of apple intake on fecal microbiota and metabolites in humans.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20304079