None, other than oesophageal stricture, really. But if all the levels are monitored and normal what is the point of taking potassium? The whole point of taking potassium was if it was low as I understood it. It just makes no sense at all.
Thanks very much.
My perception is that people here are not supplementing potassium because there's necessarily an innate problem with getting it inside the cells, but more so when they are replenishing there vitamin B levels to compensate for the depletion of K when making new blood cells and the unpleasant symptoms and dangerous outcome of hypokalemia. I may be wrong. I've only been on these boards for the past several months.
Some folks here including myself have experienced very uncomfortable symptoms when potassium is in the low normal range. The very first time I experienced these symptoms was after starting B vitamins. I had shortness of breath at rest which I'd never experienced before. I saw a medical doctor who tested me revealing a potassium level of 3.4, just slightly below normal and no other abnormalities on comprehensive blood testing. EKG was deemed " slightly flat likely due to mild hypokalemia." Based on lab results from the last 10 years, my serum potassium had never been that low and typically above 4.0.
Since then, serum potassium has been above 3.4, but I've continued to experience symptoms despite being in the normal range. The symptoms I correlate with low potassium are mild shortness of breath, chronically very tight muscles, and cramping in feet and legs. I do not get relief with taking high potassium foods. I was extremely reluctant to supplement with potassium for all the reasons that's been discussed. I am, however, able to get periodic/frequent lab work done allowing monitoring of my level (every 10 days to 3 weeks so far over the past 3 mos). What I have found is that my symptoms are greatly reduced when my potassium level is at 4.3 versus 3.5. I know that my level is up before I test due to consistently diminished symptoms, but the tests have confirmed it 3/3 opportunities. Not a large number, but something.
I don't necessarily think I have ME. My theory is that I have some level of B vitamin based anemia. I am close but do not hit the marker on blood test for enlarged blood cells. My blood work showed normal folate and b12 levels, but I felt significantly better when supplementing both and my potassium dropped dramatically when I did so. It seems plausible that I began forming new blood cells since beginning to replenish the folate and cobalamin levels. You probably saw
@Mary post discussing the same. I am very much in the same boat except my labs support the theory re: potassium.
Something else that has been brought up is the intracellular level of potassium which I understand is difficult or cannot be tested for. The notion is that the intracellular level can be low even if serum level is WNL. What are your thoughts on this?
I don't know what variety of testing methods are used to detect megoblastic anemia outside of checking red blood cell size, whether it's a mix of clinical symptoms and blood tests, how accurate testing is believed to be, or if it's known prevalence renders testing unwarranted by docs when perhaps it should be tested for. Could it be possible that folks or a percentage of folks with ME have a component of an undiagnosed anemia, that, when addressed, depletes existing potassium as is seen in the diagnosed population?
As you've undoubtedly come across, it has been suggested that there is a significant percentage of the population who likely have problems properly utilizing folate from food and supplemental synthetic folic acid (MTHFR mutation). Is this notion something that's accepted in the medical community?
Much of the discrepancy between allopathic medicine guidelines and how many folks here are guiding themselves has a lot to do with the established norms that physicians use. The standard labs/tests and norms fail to capture something very real that is going on.
These are some of the reasons why folks are feeling the need to guide themselves by their symptoms and not what a physician says is "normal" or makes sense to them based on what they've learned and what's perpetuated by the medical establishment. This process, inherently requires hypothesizing, estimating, trial and error, etc because there is nothing else one can do if they want to get better.
Apologies if others have already expressed much of this. Again, your thoughts and efforts to improve understanding and attempts to find something plausible to research in this arena is very much appreciated. This is just my opinion, but I think in this process, some questioning of established norms and of traditional medicine as a whole may be necessary to get anywhere. I have found it to be the case for me being wholly engulfed within the traditional medical community and myself resisting what "does not make sense" according to this culture.
Sorry this is so long.