Volunteer opportunity: Organizing Phoenix Rising articles
This section contains all the articles that have been published by Phoenix Rising over the years. As you will see if you browse here, some of the articles are outdated--either the research has been superseded or retracted or the article features an event or campaign that is now in...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"PACE Trial Participants – were they exploited?" (September 10) by Peter Kemp

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Tom Kindlon, Sep 14, 2016.

  1. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes:
    8,528
  2. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes:
    8,528
    I find it shocking to see the 3 press releases that went out saying the improvement rate was 60% when we now know that if the 3rd primary outcome measure overall improvers had been reported at the time the figure was only 21% for the GET and 20% for CBT. The article lists lots of media coverage that then reported this figure, among other things]






    ---



    ---

     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2016
    MeSci, actup, ukxmrv and 12 others like this.
  3. JaimeS

    JaimeS Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes:
    12,043
    Silicon Valley, CA
  4. NL93

    NL93 Senior Member

    Messages:
    146
    Likes:
    877
    The Netherlands
    Yeah wow.
    And even then the 60% claim was quite ridiculous because 45% of the SMC improved as well with their loose improvement criteria. That only leaves 15% benefit.
    And now we now it's even lower than that when following the original protocol.

    They have clearly made misleading claims and it's starting to get more and more obvious to see.
     
    MeSci, actup, Bob and 10 others like this.
  5. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes:
    8,528
     
    MeSci, actup, Daisymay and 3 others like this.
  6. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes:
    8,528
     
    MeSci, flybro, actup and 5 others like this.
  7. JaimeS

    JaimeS Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes:
    12,043
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Awesome work by Kemp! Thanks for sharing quotes @Tom Kindlon
     
    MeSci, actup, Daisymay and 4 others like this.
  8. AndyPandy

    AndyPandy Making the most of it

    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes:
    7,917
    Australia
    Thank you Peter Kemp.
     
    MeSci, ballard, flybro and 7 others like this.
  9. loops

    loops

    Messages:
    29
    Likes:
    125
    I wonder if the participants were told where their own results lay within the data.
    I had CBT at Kings I think just after the trial itself but didn't participate.
    I always wondered how my own results were quantified....Was I deemed to have been a success.?
     
    MeSci, actup, Hutan and 2 others like this.
  10. NL93

    NL93 Senior Member

    Messages:
    146
    Likes:
    877
    The Netherlands
    Yes, you have fully recovered
     
    Hutan, Webdog, Kati and 4 others like this.
  11. AndyPR

    AndyPR Senior Member

    I believe they have a similar way of working to Dr Nick Riviera
    upload_2016-9-15_18-7-39.jpeg
    along the lines of...if they didn't make you seriously worse, then they cured you, and if you did get worse, then you don't count. ;)
     
  12. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,737
    Likes:
    28,350
    Or you did it wrong.

    Heads they win, tails you lose.
     
    MeSci, Solstice, NL93 and 3 others like this.
  13. PhoenixDown

    PhoenixDown Senior Member

    Messages:
    388
    Likes:
    743
    UK
    The medical care only group did 10%, so only 10% of patients were better off with CBT or GET. Also "Recovered" could mean only working a few extra steps on the walking test. PACE-per-protocol.png

    .
     
    MeSci and TiredSam like this.
  14. Tom Kindlon

    Tom Kindlon Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes:
    8,528
    Yes, I was aware of this but worth highlighting.
     
  15. lnester7

    lnester7 Seven

    Messages:
    2,674
    Likes:
    3,885
    USA
    Yo do realized the ok was 60% vs the 73% where normal people reported being "sick" so the threshold for normal people to be sick somehow is higher than what is consider ok for us. hmmmmmmmmmmm see the sf36 table comparison.
     
    MeSci and TiredSam like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page