A New Decade of ME Research: The 11th Invest in ME International ME Conference 2016
Mark Berry presents the first in a series of articles on the 11th Invest in ME International ME Conference in London ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of the Peer-Reviewed Literature.

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by barbc56, Feb 21, 2015.

  1. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,656
    Likes:
    5,020
    This was quite eye opening.

    Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration

    http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2109855#Conclusions
    .
     
    taniaaust1 likes this.
  2. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,656
    Likes:
    5,020
    An important point here.

    http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/reporting-research-misconduct/
     
  3. Snowdrop

    Snowdrop Rebel without a biscuit

    Messages:
    2,928
    Likes:
    10,171
    Perhaps the responsibility to make science research malfeasance public should go to some other agency so that there is no conflict.
     
    taniaaust1 and barbc56 like this.
  4. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,656
    Likes:
    5,020
    @Snowdrop

    I don't think it's a matter of conflict of interest or malfeasance per se, but more of a glitch in a system that needs to be fixed.

    Nonetheless, an interesting point. Can you elaborate?

    Barb
     
  5. Snowdrop

    Snowdrop Rebel without a biscuit

    Messages:
    2,928
    Likes:
    10,171
    I was thinking of :

    However, failing to notify the medical or scientific communities about allegations of serious research misconduct in clinical trials is incompatible with the FDA’s mission to protect the public health.

    In the second paragraph of the first post. I have this week read of another science researcher who allegedly falsified data. It seems to be a growing problem (although this was not a clinical trial). So I guess I was being a bit general in my post that there should be an oversight agency that has the mandate to expose misconduct. It seems that there are conflicts with the FDA as I read this comment.
     
    barbc56 likes this.
  6. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,656
    Likes:
    5,020
    The FDA’S reply:

    Not sure what to make of this.

    Barb
     
  7. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,656
    Likes:
    5,020
    @Snowdrop

    This says it better than I can.

    .

    http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/reporting-research-misconduct/
     
    Snowdrop likes this.
  8. taniaaust1

    taniaaust1 Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,015
    Likes:
    13,048
    Sth Australia
    Im sure I read a study somewhere which found it was far higher then that.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page