• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

"Non-coeliac" wheat sensitivity replicated in double-blinded RCT

Snow Leopard

Hibernating
Messages
5,902
Location
South Australia
I remember a while back, someone posted the link to a study from Melbourne which used a double blinded randomised design to investigate the existance of 'non-coeliac' wheat sensitivity.

"Gluten causes gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects without celiac disease: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21224837

This was replicated in Italy:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22825366

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.236. [Epub ahead of print]
Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity Diagnosed by Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Challenge: Exploring a New Clinical Entity.

Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, Soresi M, D'Alcamo A, Cavataio F, Brusca I, Florena AM, Ambrosiano G, Seidita A, Pirrone G, Rini GB.
Source

Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Sciacca, ASP, Agrigento, Italy.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Non-celiac wheat sensitivity (WS) is considered a new clinical entity. An increasing percentage of the general population avoids gluten ingestion. However, the real existence of this condition is debated and specific markers are lacking. Our aim was thus to demonstrate the existence of WS and define its clinical, serologic, and histological markers.
METHODS:

We reviewed the clinical charts of all subjects with an irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like presentation who had been diagnosed with WS using a double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) challenge in the years 2001-2011. One hundred celiac disease (CD) patients and fifty IBS patients served as controls.
RESULTS:

Two hundred and seventy-six patients with WS, as diagnosed by DBPC challenge, were included. Two groups showing distinct clinical characteristics were identified: WS alone (group 1) and WS associated with multiple food hypersensitivity (group 2). As a whole group, the WS patients showed a higher frequency of anemia, weight loss, self-reported wheat intolerance, coexistent atopy, and food allergy in infancy than the IBS controls. There was also a higher frequency of positive serum assays for IgG/IgA anti-gliadin and cytometric basophil activation in "in vitro" assay. The main histology characteristic of WS patients was eosinophil infiltration of the duodenal and colon mucosa. Patients with WS alone were characterized by clinical features very similar to those found in CD patients. Patients with multiple food sensitivity were characterized by clinical features similar to those found in allergic patients.
CONCLUSIONS:

Our data confirm the existence of non-celiac WS as a distinct clinical condition. We also suggest the existence of two distinct populations of subjects with WS: one with characteristics more similar to CD and the other with characteristics pointing to food allergy.Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication, 24 July 2012; doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.236.
 

Esther12

Senior Member
Messages
13,774
Ta SL.

I wonder how solid this work is, or how much impact it will have.

I've always been a bit interested by the fact that some medical professionals seem genuinely angered by those who report responding badly to certain foods/whatever, despite not having abnormal immunological tests, with a strong assumption towards 'attention seeker, hysterical, loser'. (I know that a lot of medical professionals don't respond in this way - but it still seems that there's a widespread acceptance of this sort of response).