BurnA
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,087
With a great reply by @Jonathan Edwards on the topic of SBECS !Henrik Vogt added some comments, well, hum, à la Henrik Vogt.
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
With a great reply by @Jonathan Edwards on the topic of SBECS !Henrik Vogt added some comments, well, hum, à la Henrik Vogt.
Henrik Vogt added some comments, well, hum, à la Henrik Vogt.
I genuinely suspect he misses the point. It is a bit like saying Charles Ives's Fourth Symphony should not be called bad because there are enough B flats in it. Science occurs in the messy context of real people with strange social conventions. A Vulcan analysis may come unstuck.
He does not GET it.
Doubtless he'll tell us that we can trust the conclusions on harms because, despite the paper being a load of old bollocks, all psychiatric studies are bad at measuring harms so it would be unfair to single it out.It worries me that this guy is going to write a second piece on harms.
Julie Rehmeyer asking Neroskeptic plenty of questions on twitter. It seems his defence is, well they are all bad trials and so is PACE but that doesn't mean it's bad science
Woke up to this new addition by dr. Vogt in the comment section. It is kind of fascinating that some people are able to draw conclusions like this.
"... In practice, it is impossible to do research on therapy like CBT or lightning process or anything similar today because it is so heavily undermined by patient advocacy groups who work systematically to personally damage researchers, hamper the projects and downtalk the treatments. Treatment like this is not like a pill, it needs to be believed in, the patient needs to have some motivation and has to put some faith in it. It is likely hard to make a treatment like this work if patients are marinated with the message that it is dangerous 24/7 (a point one should also consider when interpreting the PACE study where many participants were exposed to such messages).
Those who do spread such messages, attack researchers etc. should also be aware that they also risk damaging people´s lives, a prospect they do not seem to take seriously. There seems to be something more important to them than the health and lives of others in fact. The minute patient´s who very once their fellows in suffering recover in a way like this, they are branded as not having "real ME" (just a fake fatigue) and are chastised for not having recovered in a way that supported the main cause of proving the problem is beyond human control." http://disq.us/p/1chp8uk
dr. Vogt said:Treatment like this is not like a pill, it needs to be believed in, the patient needs to have some motivation and has to put some faith in it. It is likely hard to make a treatment like this work if patients are marinated with the message that it is dangerous
wikipedia said:The placebo effect is related to the perceptions and expectations of the patient; if the substance is viewed as helpful, it can heal, but, if it is viewed as harmful, it can cause negative effects
An LP-coach said something similar as an explanation to why a lecture in LP must cost 17 000 NOK (2100 USD 1600 GBP). You see, a high price increases the patient's motivation to get better.Dr. Vogt: Treatment like this is not like a pill, it needs to be believed in, the patient needs to have some motivation and has to put some faith in it.
Treatment like this is not like a pill, it needs to be believed in, the patient needs to have some motivation and has to put some faith in it.