@redaxe @barbc56 - Provigil or Nuvigil is definitely a better choice than ritalin. It's not habit forming, its effects don't wear off over time requiring increasing dosage, and it's not as tightly regulated by governments so it's much easier to get. The main downside is it costs a lot more.
Provigil is a racemic mixture of 2 enantiomers - r and s (hence the ARmodafinil, just as there is citalopram and EScitalopram). The 2 enantiomers are mirror images, as you said above, but they are thus chemically very different and function entirely differently in the body. For example, the mirror image of glucose has no calories in people - we cannot break it down, our enzymes are chiral too, so they work differently with enantiomers or diastereomers (like enantiomers, but not all the chiral centers are opposite each other, so they aren't mirror images, even if some chiral centers may be).
One of the two enantiomers in provigil has a long half life, and the other has a short half life. Nuvigil does away with the shorter acting one, so it lasts longer throughout the day. Provigil gives a bigger boost in the morning, but then tapers off more quickly as the shorter acting enantiomer is removed. So if you have more trouble early in the morning, provigil is probably better. If you want it to last longer and be more even all day, nuvigil is probably better. Often, people take more provigil than nuvigil though, which means you get more boost early on, but then less as the day progresses. At an equivalent dose, the nuvigil will last longer (same number of milligrams).
Chirality is something the pharma companies are doing now to re-patent blockbuster drugs. In some cases, they may even be less effective (effexor is a racemic mixture, but probably works better than pristiq, which is just one enantiomer). Zyrtec has a chiral version too - and it's probably not any better (most likely, about the same). It's true that sometimes removing one of the two enantiomers gets rid of side effects - the chemicals can act very differently.
One example would be thalidomide. One enantiomer of thalidomide causes birth defects. The problem with thalidomide though is that the chiral center is a nitrogen with a lone pair in one of the 4 sp3 hybridized orbitals (tetrahedral per VSEPR model). The lone pair on a nitrogen doesn't lock it in place as with a carbon, so it spontaneously interconverts (think an umbrella on a windy day - it can flip inside out if there is enough force), so unless you make it very carefully and store it at absolute zero or something similar, it's going to be a racemic mixture (half and half) by the time the patient takes it (and it's not made to be one or the other anyways). I give it as an example of how important chirality can be in side effects (or beneficial effects). A lot of the time though, pharma companies just do it to make more money by adding a new patent - so in these cases, it's not worth paying extra. Look for studies that actually do head to head comparisons and see if it's worth the difference. With pro/nuvigil, I think there is a difference, although neither is clearly better.