• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Milk intake and risk of mortality and fractures

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6015

Milk intake and risk of mortality and fractures in women and men: cohort studies

BMJ 2014;349:g6015


Published 28 October 2014
  1. Karl Michaëlsson, professor1,
  2. Alicja Wolk, professor2,
  3. Sophie Langenskiöld, senior lecturer3,
  4. Samar Basu, professor3,
  5. Eva Warensjö Lemming, researcher14,
  6. Håkan Melhus, professor5,
  7. Liisa Byberg, associate professor1
Abstract
Objective To examine whether high milk consumption is associated with mortality and fractures in women and men.

Design Cohort studies.

Setting Three counties in central Sweden.

Participants Two large Swedish cohorts, one with 61 433 women (39-74 years at baseline 1987-90) and one with 45 339 men (45-79 years at baseline 1997), were administered food frequency questionnaires. The women responded to a second food frequency questionnaire in 1997.

Main outcome measure Multivariable survival models were applied to determine the association between milk consumption and time to mortality or fracture.

Results During a mean follow-up of 20.1 years, 15 541 women died and 17 252 had a fracture, of whom 4259 had a hip fracture. In the male cohort with a mean follow-up of 11.2 years, 10 112 men died and 5066 had a fracture, with 1166 hip fracture cases. In women the adjusted mortality hazard ratio for three or more glasses of milk a day compared with less than one glass a day was 1.93 (95% confidence interval 1.80 to 2.06). For every glass of milk, the adjusted hazard ratio of all cause mortality was 1.15 (1.13 to 1.17) in women and 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04) in men. For every glass of milk in women no reduction was observed in fracture risk with higher milk consumption for any fracture (1.02, 1.00 to 1.04) or for hip fracture (1.09, 1.05 to 1.13). The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios in men were 1.01 (0.99 to 1.03) and 1.03 (0.99 to 1.07). In subsamples of two additional cohorts, one in males and one in females, a positive association was seen between milk intake and both urine 8-iso-PGF2α (a biomarker of oxidative stress) and serum interleukin 6 (a main inflammatory biomarker).

Conclusions High milk intake was associated with higher mortality in one cohort of women and in another cohort of men, and with higher fracture incidence in women. Given the observational study designs with the inherent possibility of residual confounding and reverse causation phenomena, a cautious interpretation of the results is recommended.

 

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK
Just seen another reference to this study, so had another quick skim-read. This bit is perhaps important:

Theoretically, the findings on fractures might be explained by a reverse causation phenomenon, where people with a higher predisposition for osteoporosis may have deliberately increased their milk intake. We investigated time to first fracture, which reduces the likelihood of biased estimates. Furthermore, high milk consumption was also related to higher mortality among those without a fracture during follow-up. In the analyses we did not consider fractures caused by metastatic cancer, but cases of fractures due to suspected high impact trauma were, as recommended,36 37 retained in the analysis since these fractures are—as ordinary fragility fractures—also more common in those with low bone mineral density. The possibility of a reverse causation theory is also contradicted by the fact that fermented dairy products were related to a reduced risk of fracture and that a personal or a family history of hip fracture was not associated with a higher milk intake. Additionally, the change in average reported consumption of milk in the Swedish Mammography Cohort during a long follow-up was not affected by change in comorbidity status. Furthermore, prospective designs are more likely to generate non-differential misclassification and thus attenuate the evaluated association. None the less, we cannot rule out the possibility that our design or analysis failed to capture a reverse causation phenomenon.
 

adreno

PR activist
Messages
4,841
One problem with using milk to prevent osteoporosis, is that although milk is a good source of calcium, it isn't a good source of magnesium and vitamin D & K, which are necessary for the utilization of calcium.
 

Gondwanaland

Senior Member
Messages
5,095
I think pasteurized/defatted milk lacks D and K. I suppose green pastured butter is a rich source of those vits.
 
Last edited:

GracieJ

Senior Member
Messages
773
Location
Utah
I studied this in great depth about twenty years ago.

It seems the body uses up far more calcium than is taken in just digesting milk, and there was some suspicion about whether or not the calcium in the milk is even bioavailable.

One country looked at was Japan. As it adopted western ways, including ice cream consumption, osteoporosis increased. There may be other factors along with that, of course, but the correlation is worth thinking about.
 

MeSci

ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?
Messages
8,231
Location
Cornwall, UK
This chart about net calcium gain loss from different foods may interest you. Sorry about small text. You can increase the size by clicking on the image.

upload_2014-12-28_19-12-10.png
 

natasa778

Senior Member
Messages
1,774
This is not that new actually, the theory at least has been around for quite a few years/decades whereby increased intake of calcium (via dairy consumption or high ca supplements) messes up long-term hormonal handling of calcium and other minerals. In this scenario all is seemingly well until the menopause in most cases, after which it is all downhill. I don't remember details or if there were many studies supporting this theory but it made loads of sense. Some of it may be covered here http://www.calciumlie.com/osteoporosis/