A New Decade of ME Research: The 11th Invest in ME International ME Conference 2016
Mark Berry presents the first in a series of articles on the 11th Invest in ME International ME Conference in London ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Lawsuit claims Fitbit devices dangerously underestimate heart rate

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Ecoclimber, Jan 7, 2016.

  1. Ecoclimber

    Ecoclimber Senior Member

    FYI: I know many on here use them and other heart monitoring devices

    Lawsuit claims Fitbit devices dangerously underestimate heart rate

    With some Fitbit devices, every beat may not get counted, according to claims in a proposed nationwide class action lawsuit filed Tuesday.

    Three plaintiffs claim that their Fitbit wrist-based heart monitors, “Charge HR” and “Surge,” do not and cannot accurately measure heart rate as advertised. Those sales pitches claim that both products, which are sold for around $150 and $250, respectively, can continuously and accurately monitor heart rate, even during exercise—under tag lines such as “every beat counts.” But the lawsuit claims that the heart rate monitors, which tout “PurePulse Tracker” technology, seem particularly incapable of accurately measuring elevated heart rates, often reading dangerously underestimated rates during workouts...

    ...The lawsuit also states that a board-certified cardiologist compared the Fitbits’ heart rate measurements with those from an electrocardiogram (ECG). The doctor reportedly found that for heart rates above 110 bpm, the Fitbits were off by an average of 25 bpms, with some readings wrong by as much as 75 bpm....More:
  2. Sushi

    Sushi Moderation Resource Albuquerque

    Thanks @Ecoclimber. This information is particularly important to this patient populations as many or us rely on HR monitors for pacing. Evidently we need to research before buying.
  3. halcyon

    halcyon Senior Member

    I had heard similar criticisms but got a Charge HR anyways. So far when I've compared it to a manual pulse reading as well as a BP machine, the Charge was pretty accurate. This was under resting conditions though.
  4. valentinelynx

    valentinelynx Senior Member

    I find the FitBit's estimation of my resting heart rate is absurdly high. I have no idea what algorithm they are using, but I would think my resting heart rate would be close to what it is when I'm lying awake in bed, but the FitBit consistently calls it about 10 bpm higher.
  5. Valentijn

    Valentijn Senior Member

    My Alpha Mio matches up very well to my pulse oximeter, at least after "intense" activities like climbing the stairs or taking a shower. It's often about a second slower to change, and there are times when it has a longer lag if I'm active ... but it still catches up in 5-10 seconds.

    I also might have problems with it at times due to low pulse pressure. But healthy people doing a workout shouldn't be having a weak pulse, so that shouldn't be a problem.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page