Interesting variation on psycho-babble?

[Barry53]

Request
Response
As I do not feel you have answered my query, I This would involve going through individual files and
will clarify:
would exceed the allowed time for an FOI request,

therefore, your request has been considered in
Please provide me with the number of children accordance with the requirements of this Act. I can
seen by Dr Esther
confirm that the Trust is holding records that are
Crawley or any team led by Dr Crawley, or any
relevant to your enquiry however the cost of supplying
team where Dr Crawley
this information exceeds the appropriate statutory limit
has worked/advised/trained ‐ including
and therefore the Trust claims an exemption under
satellite clinics ‐ for
Section 12 of the FOI Act, from the need to supply the
those children who were initially:
information.

This FOI request seems to sum up where we are.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_children_re_diagnosed

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/312089/response/796004/attach/html/2/MS HB.pdf.html

http://me-pedia.org/wiki/Esther_Crawley

Mixed messages I think.

 

[GreyOwl]

Julie can attach files (yay!), but can she not see the issue with her response?