• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Discouraging News for Canadian ME Patients

Seven7

Seven
Messages
3,444
Location
USA
Show this letter to every ME Blogger to educate the Canadian public
Maybe the ME association to do a meeting and bring the latest research links and maybe do an educational workshop for the representatives.
 

ScottTriGuy

Stop the harm. Start the research and treatment.
Messages
1,402
Location
Toronto, Canada
Defies logic and reality.

It makes one wonder if it can't just be ignorance and incompetence.

Sadly, this is just the most recent example from the new review system that is taking a lot of flack - Minister of Health Philpott had to call a special meeting recently to deal with researcher revolt. But this review has got to be the winner for just plain stupidity.

An embarrassment to the Canadian research review process. And a bright shining example of how the Canadian healthcare system makes victims of ME patients.
 

JaimeS

Senior Member
Messages
3,408
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
One reason I say that is because they insist on citing Straus' 1988 acyclovir trial (#18), in which 11 patients who received acyclovir reported similar "improvements" to 10 who did not.

Just one problem: The trial was conducted before the 1988 Holmes criteria were developed. In retrospect, it turned out that only six of the original 24 patients recruited actually met the less than stringent Holmes criteria. It's conceivable that only three Holmes patients were among the 21 who finished the trial, and it's unclear how those few Holmes patients (3~6) were randomly distributed between the two arms.

Citing u. Are you sure?
 

JaimeS

Senior Member
Messages
3,408
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
Hey, all, d'you remember a convo in which we discussed the way that all personality based medicine eventually throws something in about the HPA axis? It was really funny. Anyone remember?
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
5.25" floppy disc.
I wonder if stone tablet or papyrus scroll might not be more appropriate sometimes. We needed a Rosetta stone to figure it out, and amazingly along came the PACE trial. It should be famous. Not for answers about CFS, but because it incorporates in one single study a range of fallacies and biases that probably rival any other study ever made. Now that scientists and statisticians have become aware of this the heat is turning up. The PACE trial will mostly likely be ashes in the annals of medicine, the question is when. Tomorrow would be nice, five or ten years is more reasonable.
 

JaimeS

Senior Member
Messages
3,408
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
Meanwhile, to help keep narratives like this in the trashcan where they belong -- with pride of place beside your VHS player and your 12-gallon bottle of Dep -- please consider donating to my fundraising campaign to hire a PR firm for #MillionsMissing. We need accurate stories out there to swamp out the awfulness that is this.

Here is the fundraising page: https://www.crowdrise.com/millionsmissing-round-2

If you scroll down, you can donate to me directly and help me reach my goal of $9,000 for a PR firm.

FIGHT THE POWER GUYS.