I have wondered for a while about the division that seems to exist between PR and the ME charities ( AfME and MEA).
I know some of us here on PR do comment on the charity sites but not many. Of course I don't really know but am sure I have recognised one or two who are on both.
To me this seems an opportunity lost. I joined AfME on being diagnosed, why that choice I don't know. I only gained awareness when David Tuller posted his blog, and we became very individually active. Firstly to AfME with a lot of pressure to ask for release of the Pace data which they eventually did. A few months later I left. I think I had just started lurking here.
I felt nervous on here especially at first. Everyone seemed to know so much more.
But I think we need to expand our community which, from the money raised for DT seems quite small in terms of numbers. And there are large numbers of members in the charities. I don't have the membership but someone will know.
Many of those members may, like me, be ready to learn and join in discussion here if given access to the full story.
How to do it? I think it would help if more of us commented on their fb pages. Just our individual views as today so that more names respond to the issues. There will be wider views.
When EC's son's health was discussed on AfME, a number of people jumped to her defence perhaps without knowing the wider picture. And today, when MEA posted their position re CMRC, instead of, or as well as, posting here, could PR members post on the MEA fb page so as to give a wider range of viewpoints? ( I know some of us did).
Could the reason this isn't widespread be something to do with feeling confident here and not sure there? Or they are less knowledgeable than us? ( oh god, I'm going to be hung, drawn, and quartered).
Just a view hoping to work towards enlarging our ME community if that is what we want to do.
EDIT: a bigger community could have raised money more quickly for DT