• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Daily Telegraph: It’s time for doctors to apologise to their ME patients (Charles Shepherd)

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
I tried sharing this on Facebook but its failed twice.

PS Oops. I may have tried sharing it with my friends rather than posting it to my timeline. Again, oops.
 
Last edited:

mango

Senior Member
Messages
905
I tried sharing this on Facebook but its failed twice.

i'm having some trouble too. facebook let me post the link, but it doesn't show the preview text & image like it usually does...

(some of my friends have managed to post it on facebook without any problems at all.)
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
I added my comment in reply to an all in the mind statement:

Power of the mind claims are invocation of magic. Please provide a link to any paper that proves, and I mean with objective mechanism, that this can occur. In the absence of such evidence this must be considered, as I said, an invocation of magic.

To drive this point home let me point out that Julia Newton has demonstrated the muscle abnormalities in ME exist in muscle culture long after it is removed from the patient.

The claim we don't know what it is, therefore its psychiatric, is a known fallacy, first formalized by Richard Sykes. Its called the Psychogenic Inference. In the history of medicine no claim, and I mean NO claim, that a disease is psychogenic has ever been proven.

I keep hearing that there is plenty of evidence, but I have had a challenge out there for years. If there is plenty of evidence then someone will have no problem citing a paper that proves any psychogenic illness is mental. I mean PROVES. Its all based on indirect evidence which is vaguely suggestive but which ignores other possibilities. Yet many many many times its merely been that the science has not evolved enough to identify the mechanism, the most famous case of which is the peptic ulcer and H. pylori link.

The list of failures is really huge though, maybe hundreds to thousands of diseases, including tuberculosis, epilepsy, diabetes 1 & 2, all cancer (but especially breast cancer), MS, gastric ulcers, and on and on and on.

If doctors are not diagnosing ME then perhaps its because they don't know how to or don't believe in it? That is a failure of diagnosis.
 

sarah darwins

Senior Member
Messages
2,508
Location
Cornwall, UK
The Health and Features section of the print version is today running an article on - wait for it - how new techniques of CBT such as CFT, ACT, DBT, and MBCT can help patients suffering from a whole range of illnesses. You have to wonder which of these modified versions of CBT the Wessely school are going to seize on and promote as the new answer to ME/CFS.

That one is available online: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/wellbeing/health-advice/the-new-wave-of-talking-therapies/

Quite a few books being pushed in that article, strangely enough.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
And this:

Your originating comment is also an ad hominem attack. Please provide evidence and argument.

There are consistent and scientifically replicated abnormalities that now await being proven to be diagnostic. This includes a failure in NK cell function and a sudden and dramatic loss of energy production after activity that is not seen in any other disease to date. These abnormalities are up to 95% predictive, but the hurdle is showing this occurs in no other disease. That takes time, effort and funding.

There is a treatment that has been somewhat successful, the drug Rituximab that was mentioned in the article. We await the results from the phase 3 double blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical trial, in Norway. Preliminary results may be out some time 2017.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
"The evidentiary basis for ME is much greater than the evidentiary basis for almost any psychiatric disorder. The problem is that this disease is probably heterogeneous, with CFS being highly heterogeneous. So is depression and anxiety. At least ME has consistent, replicated, predictive biomarkers.

If you want to claim that ME does not exist, all the arguments that are used that do not rely on dogmatic authority also discredit almost the entirety of the DSM, the "bible" of psychiatry. The "validity" checking of DSM diagnostic criteria consists of having a few psychiatrists getting some consistent diagnoses, not most or all, of simplistic case examples. Failure rates are high. Nobody can even agree on what depression is.

So if ME does not exist, based on any tangible argument I have heard, then neither does depression, anxiety, etc. There goes psychiatry."
 

A.B.

Senior Member
Messages
3,780
It IS primarily a psychological illness. Any reported physiological, biochemical or neural changes simply reflect the enormous influence of the human mind over the human body.

At least this commenter was honest and openly said what many of them secretly believe.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
"CFS, rather than ME, is usually defined as including a loss of either substantial functional capacity or more than half a person's usual functional capacity. Many patients are very fit, and some are even athletes, so they can be highly active with mild CFS compared to a normal sedentary person. Exercise does not help these people recover.

No study exists using objective evidence for an outcome marker that shows exercise can lead to recovery or even substantial improvement. The PACE trial, as discussed in the article, shows no benefit at two and a half years from exercise compared to any of the control arms. Indeed, if you reformulate the data it shows these patients are worse off, though perhaps not significantly worse off. We also know from a previous PACE paper that all this graded exercise does not result in an improvement in fitness.

Three government reports of CBT/GET used in clinical practice, in Holland and Belgium, show graded exercise does not work. One of these had more patients than the PACE trial."
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
"
"Blood changes are ephemeral or absent, not repeatable or inconsistent with the problem complained about."

This comment is very out of date. One blood change which is consistent and repeatable is NK cell dysfunction. An entire arm of the innate immune system does not work right.

Another consistent and repeatable finding, though not a blood test, is the 2 day CPET protocol. There is a massive crash in energy production after activity. This is not fatigue, its a loss of ability to perform any activity, which is objectively measurable, and about 95% accurate. It does have problems though as it induces the problem in order to measure it.

It now appears that we understand why the cytokine data is often inconsistent. It turns out ME has stages, and the two stages have opposite cytokine profiles, so any study mixing the stages (which is most of them to date) will have mixed data. Averages are not useful here, you need to see a scatter plot and do a cluster analysis."
 

Tom Kindlon

Senior Member
Messages
1,734
i'm having some trouble too. facebook let me post the link, but it doesn't show the preview text & image like it usually does...

(some of my friends have managed to post it on facebook without any problems at all.)
I just posted this to my Facebook account: interesting to see I'm not the only one:
I posted this link earlier but Facebook seems to have deleted it (I can't see it and I checked via another account and couldn't see it here either). It seems to have been triggered by my liking of 34 posts by Facebook friends of the same post. Also, when I post it now, it doesn't give the preview box. And when I go to the pages of Facebook friends who posted it, the post is no longer visible to me.
 

Tom Kindlon

Senior Member
Messages
1,734
If I try to share from Facebook, it says:

"Warning: This Message Contains Blocked Content
Your message couldn't be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive."

Somebody else got this too.