• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Australia: trial of professional education to improve CFS management

Kati

Patient in training
Messages
5,497
(Not a recommendation)

Randomised controlled trial of online continuing education for health professionals to improve the management of chronic fatigue syndrome: a study protocol

http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/5/e014133

Li SH1,2, Sandler CX1,3, Casson SM1, Cassar J1,3, Bogg T1, Lloyd AR3, Barry BK1,4,5.
Author information
1)School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
2)School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
3)The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
4)Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
5)School of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract
INTRODUCTION:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a serious and debilitating illness that affects between 0.2%-2.6% of the world's population. Although there is level 1 evidence of the benefit of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) for some people with CFS, uptake of these interventions is low or at best untimely. This can be partly attributed to poor clinician awareness and knowledge of CFS and related CBT and GET interventions. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of participation in an online education programme, compared with a wait-list control group, on allied health professionals' knowledge about evidence-based CFS interventions and their levels of confidence to engage in the dissemination of these interventions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS:

A randomised controlled trial consisting of 180 consenting allied health professionals will be conducted. Participants will be randomised into an intervention group (n=90) that will receive access to the online education programme, or a wait-list control group (n=90). The primary outcomes will be: 1) knowledge and clinical reasoning skills regarding CFS and its management, measured at baseline, postintervention and follow-up, and 2) self-reported confidence in knowledge and clinical reasoning skills related to CFS. Secondary outcomes include retention of knowledge and satisfaction with the online education programme. The influence of the education programme on clinical practice behaviour, and self-reported success in the management of people with CFS, will also be assessed in a cohort study design with participants from the intervention and control groups combined.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:

The study protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at The University of New South Wales (approval number HC16419). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal articles and presentations at scientific conferences and meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:
ACTRN12616000296437.
 
Last edited:

Esther12

Senior Member
Messages
13,774
Thanks. Think you missed the link: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/5/e014133

Once again relying on Cochrane to avoid addressing the real problems with the research that claims to show CBT and GET are effective treatments.

Cochrane reviews of both cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT)3 and graded exercise therapy (GET)4 provide level 1 evidence of their benefits for people with CFS.

A mention of the PACE controversy, but only referencing the Smith blog:

Yet uptake of evidence-based CFS management programmes delivered by allied health professionals such as psychologists, exercise physiologists and physiotherapists is low.11 12 Recent studies have shown that gaps between research and practice are at least partially due to allied health professionals lacking the knowledge and skills to provide appropriate care,13 14 and potentially also the effects of the controversy regarding the PACE (Pacing, graded Activity, and Cognitive behaviour therapy; a randomised Evaluation) trial analysis.15

15. Smith R . Secondary Richard Smith: QMUL and King’s college should release data from the PACE trial. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/12/16...lege-should-release-data-from-the-pace-trial/ (accessed Dec 2016).
 

Kati

Patient in training
Messages
5,497
Thanks. Think you missed the link: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/5/e014133

Once again relying on Cochrane to avoid addressing the real problems with the research that claims to show CBT and GET are effective treatments.



A mention of the PACE controversy, but only referencing the Smith blog:



15. Smith R . Secondary Richard Smith: QMUL and King’s college should release data from the PACE trial. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/12/16...lege-should-release-data-from-the-pace-trial/ (accessed Dec 2016).
The link. Yes. Thank you, I will add it to my original post.
 

Mohawk1995

Senior Member
Messages
287
As in most education models, the motivation of the person to actually learn is the biggest indicator of success. As Confucius said "When the student is ready, the teacher will appear".

Not a bad thing to educate health professionals, but it is not the Allied Health Professionals who need this the most, it is the Primary Health Care Providers (MD, DO, PA, NP, Psychiatrists and Psychologists) who need it most!

Also online education is not the best tool to educate unless in this case you have it include a link to Jenn Brea's TED talk or a way to view her documentary. Online ed really lacks personal touch.
 

Kati

Patient in training
Messages
5,497
As in most education models, the motivation of the person to actually learn is the biggest indicator of success. As Confucius said "When the student is ready, the teacher will appear".

Not a bad thing to educate health professionals, but it is not the Allied Health Professionals who need this the most, it is the Primary Health Care Providers (MD, DO, PA, NP, Psychiatrists and Psychologists) who need it most!

Also online education is not the best tool to educate unless in this case you have it include a link to Jenn Brea's TED talk or a way to view her documentary. Online ed really lacks personal touch.
I agree that primary health provider needs the most education, however i have great concerns about this study, notably about the curriculum. I highly suspect they will promote CBT and GET and omit the current science.
 

Mohawk1995

Senior Member
Messages
287
I highly suspect they will promote CBT and GET and omit the current science.

Agree completely. Depends on their agenda. That is why I think it more important for the learner to truly be motivated (not to be told what is "fact" by those with their agenda). If someone truly wants to learn about ME they would most likely come across all of the literature and would be able to discern the "chaff from the wheat". This should be especially true for a health care "professional" who would be expected to be able to critically review the literature. BUT critical thinking seems to be lacking from much of medicine these days.
 

Valentijn

Senior Member
Messages
15,786
Not a bad thing to educate health professionals, but it is not the Allied Health Professionals who need this the most, it is the Primary Health Care Providers (MD, DO, PA, NP, Psychiatrists and Psychologists) who need it most!
Education would be nice. But this protocol seems to be describing the dissemination of misinformation which is very harmful to patients. No one needs that.