Jo Best
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,032
@slysaint not forgetting David Tuller and those agreeing with him - http://www.virology.ws/2016/11/21/trial-by-error-continued-the-new-fitnet-trial-for-kids/
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
If I may liken the NHS to the BBC, Esther Crawley is the equivalent of a radio 1 DJ in the 1970s, abusing as many young people as she likes, completely unaccountable, while everyone who knows about it or should know about it turns a blind eye because it suits them.I do wonder how this grandstanding is allowed on an NHS site freely viewed if the study is really being reviewed?
Now then, I ask you, how could anyone possibly imagine the pictured subject stands for anything but the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
I couldn't agree more @TiredSamIf I may liken the NHS to the BBC, Esther Crawley is the equivalent of a radio 1 DJ in the 1970s, abusing as many young people as she likes, completely unaccountable, while everyone who knows about it or should know about it turns a blind eye because it suits them.
The same goes for the whole Wessely school. Decades later, when so many people have been classified as suffering from MUS that it reaches a tipping point, suddenly society can be shocked and horrified and wonder how it was ever allowed to happen. I get the feeling that ME patients were just the dry run, they won't be happy until they've abused every last person who visits the doctor with a headache.
View attachment 19496
Now then, I ask you, how could anyone possibly imagine the pictured subject stands for anything but the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. And that the headline words, the picture, and even the pose, are simply happenstance, and could not possibly have been artfully chosen to achieve a desired psychological impact. If you did not know better you might think it was advertiser's guile.
I talked to a famous researcher who experienced something similar when he advocated children should be vaccinated against preventable illnesses. Why do you continue I asked him? His answer? “Because it is right”
Is this a new ploy, equating CBT / QUACK THERAPY objectors to vaccine objectors. ?
In case Crawley reads this forum.