After the charade of video and p2p I think as a community all efforts should go to separate CFS from ME.
We are never going to move forward until that happens. We can agree later on criteria, and details.
The bad we loose all the current studies? Well since they are obviously un-usable to our advantage anyways, not big loss since none was worth including for p2p. We can use the raw data and republish w the ME criteria and exclude the vague CFS subjects. and we duplicate the good ones, double blinded. Which apparently is what will get us somewhere. Just my conclusion.
We are never going to move forward until that happens. We can agree later on criteria, and details.
The bad we loose all the current studies? Well since they are obviously un-usable to our advantage anyways, not big loss since none was worth including for p2p. We can use the raw data and republish w the ME criteria and exclude the vague CFS subjects. and we duplicate the good ones, double blinded. Which apparently is what will get us somewhere. Just my conclusion.