AHRQ draft article on ME/CFS diagnosis and treatment, needs comments!

[Ruthie24]

http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq...rts/?pageaction=displayProduct&productID=1976

This appears to be the same old "GET and CBT are effective and nothing else is proven to be" review article. The difference is that is says in the opening statement that it may be used to help set practice guidelines and was funded by NIH. It's a draft and comment period is open until October 20th 2014.

Sorry if this has been posted before but I've been a little out of the loop recently and didn't see it when I was looking for it in the various forums.

 

[alex3619]

See: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/index.php?threads/the-p2p-draft-systematic-review-is-up.32719/

This is a P2P related advocacy issue. There are many threads related to this. I have read that the reply period is extended to January, but have not confirmed this.

 

[Dolphin]

See: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/index.php?threads/the-p2p-draft-systematic-review-is-up.32719/

This is a P2P related advocacy issue. There are many threads related to this. I have read that the reply period is extended to January, but have not confirmed this.

No, I believe that is the reply period on the report they release in December i.e. a separate deadline.

 

[alex3619]

No, I believe that is the reply period on the report they release in December i.e. a separate deadline.

Thanks for the clarification.

This was posted elsewhere
We have until October 20th to respond to the evidence review. That time is unchanged.

The extension is in the response period on the P2P report, extended to 30 days (from the original 15).

 

[Ruthie24]

Thanks! I knew I could count on you all to know about this. I was aware of the P2P thing but somehow missed the connection with this. Blaming it on brain fog. Thanks for straightening me out.