Nukes don't contain fluoride...and even if they did the over all effects of the weapon vastly outdoes any basic chemical issues by huge margin. Part of the insane lie, indeed, myopia of the nuclear strategy is the sick morons couldn't see the glaring problems with their game plans:
1) Russia relied on huge thermo nukes ot exterminate enemy populace, megaton class weapons guarantee enormous firestorms (beyond certain point around 300 kilotons irc, heat pulse out paces distance of blast effects as squared rather than cubed dilution of effect with range), whole cities burn, guarantees global freeze etc.
2) NATO/America prided themselves on smarter more accurate weapons, designed ot take out enemy bases etc. well DUH, that means ground bursts, which means insane amounts of radiation especially if you hit stockpiles of metals (tanks, planes, bases) or nuclear materials (warheads and electric generating reactors for power and propulsion)
and every time I read the ludicrous garbage stating the smaller NATO warheads wouldn't create firestorms I wanted to puke, sorry morons out there but modern buildings will burst or topple when hit by nuke blasts etc especially since they will be MIRVed with overlapping effects from multiple warheads in clusters, and did no one consider what happens in cities with huge numbers of vehicles, loaded with fuel, well they become flying burning battering rams AND there won't be any bloody emergency response or ability to put out fires ensuring conflagrations become firestorms
did NONE of those dumb ***** actually consider their tests were done out in deserts, atolls over water etc that REFLECTED most of the heat and had only a handful of staged buildings completely unlike a REAL complex city which would funnel blast winds, have cars thrown through buildings at 200+mph etc?
PLEASE read folsk epscially any who support nuclear "deterrence", it's absolute suicidal rbbish we cannot survive with
http://www.nukefix.org/weapon.html
Eight low tech "Hiroshima" 20kiloton bombs will be as effective, more so actually than a 1 megaton high-tech weapon
US/UK uses Tridents, each submarine launched missile has 4 or 5 warheads of 100kilotons (US versions can carry 12 but treaties limit that), wipe out any city you want, few will survive as the effects of overlapping bursts means a fence, a corral of firestorms, few will ever survive unlike at Nagasaki
Uranium hexafluoride (main form of depleted uranium) though IS a huge , terrible threat to health. By product of processing to make plutonium, Fukushima, Chernobyl, Sellafield and others, all big lie, big arrogant screw ups, their use as civilian reactors were excuses, real purpose was for plutonium production for bombs hence grotesque mismanagement and governmental interference etc
I know Japan has no nuclear forces...reciprocal work with US for US "shield" etc.
USA is working on processing its UHF6 into much "safer" metal, but it' still highly toxic and low level alpha emitter.
UHF6 is horrendous stuff, violently reactive extremely corrosive, has to be moved into new containers every decade or so, low power explosion on hitting air, releases deadly HF gas, sprays uranium (which is pyrophoric) all over
Alex
our
leaders will easily "buy into" any damn bullshit that sounds good, and many assholes know this, "seeling" them whatever will give them power, kudos and wealth, that is the truth.
time to end politics it's a death cycle.
democracy by lottery, like jury duty one term only, end incumbency, no re-elections only practical sane answer to much of our woes.
NO ONE SHOULD GET POWER WHO DESIRES IT! :/
see Russel brand interview folk are going on about, finally the penny is dropping