• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

FDA Drug Development Workshop: Part One

View the Post on the Blog

by Joel (snowathlete) and Gabby (Nielk)

FDA-Public-Workshop-300x218.jpg


The FDA Drug Development Workshop for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) took place last week on the 25th and 26th of April. It was well attended by patients, advocates, doctors, representatives of the CDC and even a few pharmaceutical reps.

The workshop was also broadcast live over the internet, enabling many more people to follow what happened without being there in person. This meeting was an opportunity for us to be heard, and continues to be an opportunity as comments can still be added to the docket until August 2nd 2013.

For those interested in a summary, this will be the first of several articles which attempt to summarize 85,000 words of talk over two days into only a few thousand words. At the bottom of each article is a link to the video recordings on the FDA site, as well as a transcript of the video discussed in the article. At the top of each transcript, we have added a list of who talks in that video along with timestamps of when they talked, and timestamps are given throughout this article as well for your reference. This will allow you to skip ahead to the part of a video which interests you the most, in case you don’t fancy catching up on two full days of talking from start to finish. We hope this will be a useful resource for readers!

Day one of the workshop was divided into the following four segments, the first two of which are covered in this first article. The third and fourth segments of day one will be covered by a subsequent article.
  • An Introduction from the FDA, with an overview of FDA’s Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative and an overview of the discussion format for the rest of the workshop [video one] [transcript]
  • Discussion 1: Disease Symptoms and Daily Impacts That Matter Most to Patients, starting with a panel of patients and representatives (Dr John Kaiser, Joseph Landson, Denise Lopez-Majano, Kim McCleary, Charlotte von Salis), and then followed by a large-group discussion. [video two] [transcript]
  • Discussion 2: Patient perspective on treating CFS and ME. Starting with a panel of patients and representatives (Lucinda Bateman, ME; Lisa Corbin, MD, FACP; Lily Chu, MD, MSPH; Jose Montoya, MD, FACP, FIDSA; Jennifer Spotila, JD; Christine Williams, MEd) and then followed by a large-group discussion. [video three]
  • A period of open public comments (Michael Walzer, Anita Patton, Courtney Alexander, Steven Chilinski, Judy Mikovits, Derek Enlander, Diane Lewis, Thomas Equels, Gisela Morales-Barreto, David Strayer, Dan Peterson, Mary Silvey, Eileen Holderman, James Baraniuk, Charles Lapp, Steven Lempert, Dwight Merriman, Joan Grobstein, Jeannette Burmeister), wrapped up by some closing remarks from the FDA. [video three]
As the FDA meeting started in the afternoon on the first day, Dr Peterson very intelligently arranged a meeting titled “Scientifically Redefining CFS/ME”, taking place before the FDA-workshop began. This meeting was well-attended, with Dr. Enlander, Dr. Nancy Klimas, and others participating. The content of that meeting is not specifically discussed in this article, but if was nice to see our ME/CFS researchers making the most of the opportunity.


Day one, part one: An overview of FDA’s Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative [video one] [transcript]

It appears from the opening presentation that the FDA was genuinely engaged and they seemed to understand that the illness is very serious and debilitating. They said that they wanted to listen to the patients and careers present, and learn from the researchers and clinicians already involved in the disease.

"…Our goal is to move forward,” said Admiral Sandra Kweder, Deputy Director in the Office of Planning and Informatics at the FDA, in her opening presentation. A good start, because patients are keener than anyone to move forward, and we have waited a long time to be heard.

Next, Theresa Mullin, Director, Office of Planning and Informatics, FDA [timestamp:13:50] talked about ‘Patient-focused Drug Development’, describing it as “an opportunity for patients to talk, and frankly, for everyone else to listen.” She said that this was the first time this initiative was being put in progress to get direct input from patients to help in FDA decision making, and “an important adjunct to our benefit/risk framework.”

She then went on to explain that as part of this framework, they want to gain insight into the clinical perspective of patients and caregivers, with a strong emphasis on the patient’s willingness to accept risk in treatment. This seems to be the most significant of several factors that the FDA is considering alongside questions about the severity of illness, degree of unmet need, clinical trial data, risk and safety. This change alone could signal a real and significant opportunity.

Earlier this year Ampligen was rejected, despite the fact that patients explained their willingness to take risks with treatments to have a chance at recovery. The importance of this new framework is that it is not drug specific, where such evidence from patients and clinicians is treated with some caution as it is more open to influence by people with vested interests.

What this new framework will do, by not being drug-specific, is set an unbiased target for every drug application for ME and CFS, and if we tell the FDA that we have no good treatments currently, are seriously debilitated and are willing to accept risk in taking a drug where safety data might be sketchy, the chances of a drug like Ampligen getting approved would probably be greater than before.

Something else that the FDA (and us) are hoping will come out of this new initiative, is better end-point measures for drug trials.

After this introduction, the microphone was passed to Sara Eggers, PhD. Office of Planning and Informatics, FDA [timestamp: 24:30], who explained the format of the discussions that would take place next. This isn’t terribly exciting, so you may want to skip it. It runs to the end of the first video.


Day One, Part Two: Disease Symptoms and Daily Impacts That Matter Most to Patients [video two][transcript]

After a break, the workshop was reconvened with a panel of patients and representatives reporting on Disease Symptoms and Daily Impacts That Matter Most to Patients

Moderators: Sara Eggers, Ph.D. & Theresa Toigo, R.Ph., M.B.A.
A panel of patients and patient representatives provided comments to start the discussion (First half hour)

There are two questions that they were asked to comment on:
  1. What are the most significant symptoms that you experience resulting from your condition?
  2. What are the most negative impacts on your daily life that result from your condition and its symptoms?
Dr. Jon Kaiser: A medical practicing Doctor in San Francisco who came down with CFS in 1987 [timestamp 00:57 – 05:40]

Jon-Kaiser-300x195.jpg

Dr. Jon Kaiser

Jon describes himself as being able to work during the week, with limitations, and then crashing each weekend at home. “I’m here to speak for the thousands of people with CFS who are able to work, but struggle to make it through each day and each week,” he said. He spends Saturdays and Sundays in bed in order to be able to return to work on Monday.

The greatest toll is on his family because he can’t attend to his children and to social events. He explains “I don’t know if I can convey the psychological distress I feel when I’m unable to spend time with my daughters, or participate in family activities.”

He struggles with the fact that family and friends can’t understand how he can feel so sick at home when he’s able to work and hold a job.


Joseph Landson: A veteran and Graduate student – ill for 8 years [timestamp 06:00 – 09:28]

Joseph-Landson.jpg

Joseph Landson

Joseph used to be a military linguist and now he can’t finish his thesis. This is his seventh year into a two year master’s program. He used to do translations in complicated languages like Arabic. At times, multiple translations at once while listening in on each ear. Today, he can be writing down something and when he reads it back the next day, he doesn’t comprehend it. He questions then whether he was confused when he wrote it or is it that he is totally confused while reading it back? “In a sense it doesn’t matter,” he says. “The previous day’s work is probably wasted.”


Denise Lopez-Majano: Mother and full-time caregiver of 2 ill boys, ages 20 & 21 [timestamp 09:40 – 14:05]

Denise-Lopez-Majano.jpg

Denise Lopez-Majano

Denise's sons were 12 and 15 when they first got ill. They were athletic and very active academically and socially, with a full schedule. Today, they are both housebound. “Because they require 24/7 care,” Denise states, “I’m nearly as housebound as they are.” Their most problematic symptom is their impaired executive functioning and slow processing speed. Not only are they impaired cognitively, but when trying to concentrate for more than 20 minutes, they will collapse for weeks (PEM/PENE). Because of this, they cannot study without functional collapse.


Kim McCleary: CEO of CFIDS Association of America [timestamp 14:20 to 19:36]

Kim-McCleary.jpg

Kim McCleary

Kim responded based on a survey of 1,300 patients.

The breakdown of age of onset of symptoms is as follows:
18 years or younger - 250
19 to 35 - 500
36 to 50 - 452
51 and older - 157

Average age of illness duration: 18 years!

Answering the question of what has had the most ‘impact on daily life’:
  1. Fear of increased death or disease.
  2. Life is not worth living or life stops – because of loss of career, social life etc.
  3. Lack of effective treatments (unmet need).
  4. Can’t work because of sleeplessness, medication side effect, muscle pain, migraines, blurred vision and exhaustion.
  5. Social isolation.

Charlotte von Salis: Lawyer, ill for 22 years. She fits the ME-ICC and the CCC criteria [timestamp 19:53 – 23:57]

Charlotte-Van-Salis.jpg

Charlotte von Salis

She used to work as a lawyer and is now unemployed and housebound. Her most troublesome symptom is her neurological and cognitive deficits. She cannot concentrate and has trouble understanding. Her IQ has been reduced to 107. She also has great sensitivity to light (was wearing sunglasses indoors) as well as to sound. “I can’t focus with much visual stimulation, for example: too many objects in a store, music in a restaurant or a busy website.”


Audience of patients and patient representatives add to the dialogue [Last 38 mins]

Sara (moderator) asked about the following issues:

Cognitive symptoms

Patients replied with the following difficulties:
  • Short term memory loss was mentioned by a few, along with loss of concentration and/or focus. Many expressed problems with word-finding. One expressed that it was so bad as to cause them to stutter.
  • The cognitive issues cause patients to have difficulties with decision-making.
  • Multi-tasking problems, especially for those who are still working. They can only concentrate on one thing at a time.
  • Speaking difficulty was mentioned, especially in the context of the effort that it takes to testify at this meeting which comes at a great cost to the patient participants (big thanks to our heroes who attended and participated for us!!!). Many mentioned how they will suffer for this later, for days or weeks.
Sara suggested that this mental confusion must be causing anxiety? I loved Joan’s reply: No, it does not cause anxiety. It causes fear. The difference between anxiety and fear is that anxiety is a worry about something that might happen. Whereas fear is worry about something one knows will happen.

Crashes

The following were mentioned regarding crashes:
  • They are unpredictable – one day an activity can be okay and on another day it can cause a crash. At times, a crash will happen with no apparent reason.
  • Most agreed that when one is crashing, whether because of physical or mental effort, it shows up as a worsening of all symptoms (not just fatigue).
  • One person described a crash as something that she can feel instantly: “a change in my whole body”.
  • Many feel that the lack of quality sleep, or unrefreshing sleep, is a trigger for their crash or worsening of symptoms.
  • The length of a crash could be a day, a week or months (years?). Someone described it as “a moving target” – no one knows what the price will be for any given activity whether mental or physical.
  • Some know what their envelope of activity can hold; others don’t because it changes all the time.
Important Issues
  • A person mentioned that their crash correlates with the findings of low NK-cells and high viral titers. We do have Science to measure this (most important to note!).
  • Measurable symptoms when crashing that were mentioned: a sore throat, fever/chills and a worsening of GI problems like IBS.
  • Just like diabetes that has the main identifiable symptom of high blood sugar and then many variable symptoms, so too CFS must have, besides all these variable symptoms, a main common symptom – it just has not been identified yet.
  • A sentiment heard from a few patients: “it’s nice to have a place to be heard.”
Links to Videos and Transcripts

All Videos: http://www.tvworldwide.com/events/fda/130425/

Day 1, Part 1: An Introduction from the FDA Video Transcript

Day 1, Part 2: Discussion: Disease Symptoms and Daily Impacts That Matter Most to Patients Video Transcript


Coming soon: In the next article in this series, we'll review the third video, covering the third and fourth sessions from day one of the workshop.


Joel was diagnosed with ME/CFS in 2009 but struggled with the illness for some time prior to this. He loves to write, and hopes to regain enough health to return to the career he loved and have his work published.

Gabby is a patient with ME/CFS - disabled since 2003. She is passionate about raising awareness of the plight of severe sufferers of this disease.



Phoenix Rising is a registered 501 c.(3) non profit. We support ME/CFS and NEID patients through rigorous reporting, reliable information, effective advocacy and the provision of online services which empower patients and help them to cope with their isolation.

There are many ways you can help Phoenix Rising to continue its work. You can even donate significant sums, at no cost to yourself, as you shop online! To find out more, visit Phoenix Rising’s Donate page by clicking the button below.


View the Post on the Blog
 
That's what I understood her to mean as well. But I still fear that the FDA didn't understand that at least not fully. Thinking that our fear is causing the crash itself as in psychosomatic wise. Some of what I have watched of the FDA event has me concerned.

I think all the patients did a great job of trying to convey and explain to the FDA what we experience. But I still see ( pick up ) a sense of bewilderment, disbelief and skepticism as if they're (FDA) having a hard time of processing, understanding or accepting what they've been told.

I can't help but feel that they are almost psychoanalyzing everyone (not just the patients) and what they say on the ME/CFS side. Trying to make it fit what they've probably gleamed from the NIH, CDC and UK NHS.
 
That's what I understood her to mean as well. But I still fear that the FDA didn't understand that at least not fully. Thinking that our fear is causing the crash itself as in psychosomatic wise. Some of what I have watched of the FDA event has me concerned.

I think all the patients did a great job of trying to convey and explain to the FDA what we experience. But I still see ( pick up ) a sense of bewilderment, disbelief and skepticism as if they're (FDA) having a hard time of processing, understanding or accepting what they've been told.

I can't help but feel that they are almost psychoanalyzing everyone (not just the patients) and what they say on the ME/CFS side. Trying to make it fit what they've probably gleamed from the NIH, CDC and UK NHS.

I don't know, I didn't really get that impression myself, but I'd be interested to hear if anyone else thought that.
Regardless, I think it is important that patients who weren't at the meeting, submit their comments to the docket, which they can still do. It is especially important to highlight anything that was missing, or may have been missunderstood at the meeting itself.
 
I'm still working my way through it so I hope I'm wrong and just being overly concerned. I'll try watching them a second time if I'm able to and if they're still available to see If my perspective changes.
 
That's what I understood her to mean as well. But I still fear that the FDA didn't understand that at least not fully. Thinking that our fear is causing the crash itself as in psychosomatic wise. Some of what I have watched of the FDA event has me concerned.

I think all the patients did a great job of trying to convey and explain to the FDA what we experience. But I still see ( pick up ) a sense of bewilderment, disbelief and skepticism as if they're (FDA) having a hard time of processing, understanding or accepting what they've been told.

I can't help but feel that they are almost psychoanalyzing everyone (not just the patients) and what they say on the ME/CFS side. Trying to make it fit what they've probably gleamed from the NIH, CDC and UK NHS.

I don't know, I didn't really get that impression myself, but I'd be interested to hear if anyone else thought that.

I agree with snowathlete here. I thought that they were sincere and receptive, and that they were genuinely approaching the subject afresh. When they discussed anxiety and fear, I thought that the officials were genuinely absorbing the information in an unbiased way, and acknowledged the difference. That was my own perception of the events. I was very encouraged by the whole process.

Regardless, I think it is important that patients who weren't at the meeting, submit their comments to the docket, which they can still do. It is especially important to highlight anything that was missing, or may have been missunderstood at the meeting itself.
Yes, this is important. They say they are listening to all of us, so we have a chance to have our voices heard, and our experiences understood.
 
I don't know if these have been posted before.

The FDA have released the official transcripts.

FDA conference website:
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/NewsEvents/ucm319188.htm

Transcript 1 (Day 1):
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/NewsEvents/UCM354951.pdf

Transcript 2 (Day 2):
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/NewsEvents/UCM355406.pdf


Also, there's a very short summary of the conference. I don't know if this is new:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/NewsEvents/UCM353896.pdf

An interesting/promising extract from the summary:

"This facilitated discussion with patients with CFS and ME provided a particularly valuable opportunity for FDA to hear in patients’ own words about how they experience their disease. For instance, one patient, when discussing a clinical term associated with the disease, “post-exertional malaise,” noted that she considered this aspect of ME-CFS to be more like “post-exertional collapse,” with exacerbation of multiple disease symptoms. Many patients shared stories of having had successful and productive lives prior to contracting CFS and ME but now struggle with even the simplest tasks of daily life. They also shared stories of debilitating episodes of CFS and ME that last days, weeks, months, and even years, before abating."