@arewenearlythereyet: this is why I asked for a more medically correct terminology for what many well respected members of PR speak of as burn out. And I'm not so sure it is derogatory? Sounds like a pretty valid analogy to me - just not for ME. But in fairness I'm not in a position to know if some people say it in a derogatory manner. I used it because I don't know what a better terminology is. I would only want to use an alternative name if there were some consensus, not merely opinion.
Yes and I took it that way
@Barry53 certainly not a criticism of your good self
. I would also like a definition of the term.....it is so general to be meaningless, which is why I am often drawn to the context in which it is used.
I was thinking mainly where I've seen it used elsewhere on other threads in addition to this one. I seem to be hearing it used more frequently. I'm asking myself ...is it a well known disease I'm not familiar with, or some colloquialism I've not heard of before?
I have looked online, but this just comes up with a load of old wives tales and psychology BS about working too hard and personality types! I can't find anything biological. I can't open the medscape thing
@AndyPR since I don't have a meds cape account. On looking further though I did find that this was a term coined by a psychologist in the 1970s to describe a group of symptoms ...which was a big alarm bell going off in terms of whether this is a genuine thing or something made up.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0072470/#!po=7.14286
More importantly is how it's used. It mostly seems to be used as a way to shut down further enquiry. It certainly sounds derogatory when I hear it used most of the time. For example....." She clearly hasn't got ME she has burnout!". In this context I take this to mean that burnout (whatever it is) is somehow inferior and minor and relatively common. I'm still none the wiser as to what it is
If there is a real medical condition called "burn out" I am genuinely interested to understand what the origins are of such a crude description ...sounds a bit like "hysteria" to me....i.e. Generalised and outdated terminology.