Invisible Illness Awareness Week 2016: Our Voices Need to Be Heard
Never heard of Invisible Illness Awareness Week? You're not alone. Jody Smith sheds a little light to make it more visible
Discuss the article on the Forums.

XMRV revisited (Split from Hornig/Lipkin lawsuit thread)

Discussion in 'XMRV Research and Replication Studies' started by Hustler, Jun 7, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kina

    Kina

    Messages:
    10,132
    Likes:
    17,219
    Sofa, UK
    You have not provided any answers to any of my questions. I wouldn't consider posting the supplementary information from the retracted study or her response to the retraction as tearing all my questions apart.

    You have yet to post any evidence to support your statements. Mikovits has never posted any research to support her statements.

    Comments like the following are not proof of anything without including any actual proof of something:

    If you so sure that multiple teams made multiple errors, then post the some actual examples with an explanation.

    I am not trying to give any impression, I am trying to provide actual evidence to counter your comments so people reading this thread can read more than repeated rants with no actual evidence to support the repeated rants.

    How about knocking off the veiled insults and actually respond with some actual proof of your statements. Just because you say something over and over, doesn't make it true.

    Let's not forget the 'slide of shame'.

    http://parakoch.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/mikovits-slide-of-shame-1.html

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...c-fatigue-syndr-29/ &cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

    Here's an explanation why bad science never dies with a mention related to Mikovits

    https://qz.com/595909/why-bad-science-wont-ever-die/

    And again here is a very recent study that was already mentioned in this thread

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589117

     
    Valentijn, Sushi and AndyPR like this.
  2. Hip

    Hip Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,468
    Likes:
    14,980
    Stupidity is a common human trait, and science is certainly not immune from it. But that's different to what you were saying before, which is that the negative XMRV replication studies were fraudulent, implying that there was a global world-wide conspiracy to sweep XMRV under the carpet.

    And if your want to demonstrate that scientists have made a mistake, you need to do that will logical argument and evidence. Nobody is going to listen to you until you provide a sober fact and logic based argument.



    It should be noted that here Mikovits et al found evidence of a gammaretrovirus, not specifically XMRV. XMRV is part of the class of viruses known as gammaretrovirus, but gammaretrovirus also includes other viruses such as the murine leukemia virus, and the feline leukemia virus.

    The PCR and the detection of gammaretrovirus proteins by Western Blot we can discount, because we know these are both in error (see here for why the Western Blot was in error).

    As for the two remaining methods, I have very little knowledge of retrovirology, so I cannot give any opinion on how much weight we should attach to these findings. I have to rely on what the experts in the field say, and I don't remember any other virologist commenting on this finding of evidence of a gammaretrovirus.

    But multiple experts from around the world have overturned the evidence that XMRV is found in ME/CFS patients, and so unless you think you know more that all these people, you have go with that conclusion.

    So at present, we have no evidence for XMRV being involved in ME/CFS; but that does not rule out the possibility of another retrovirus or gammaretrovirus being involved.

    Maybe when Dr Lipkin has a chance to look more deeply into the preliminary evidence he found of retroviruses in ME/CFS, we may gain further insight.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2017
    AndyPR likes this.
  3. Hustler

    Hustler I m a hustler

    Messages:
    56
    Likes:
    26
    Europe
    Total joke
    You guys are all on the run
    I m loving it
    Answered all your questions and you keep coming back with the same rubbish.
    Enough has been shown here in this thread.
    Nothing more to add
     
  4. Hip

    Hip Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,468
    Likes:
    14,980
    Another thing, @Hustler: you invariably find that when ME/CFS patients have been fortunate enough to gain full remission from their symptoms, they no longer hang around on ME/CFS forums, because they now have a full life to lead, and throw themselves into this new life with gusto.

    So if you are in full remission, what are you doing here? Someone in full remission would be out enjoying themselves. Or could it be that you are not quite in the full remission that you claim you are?
     
    Valentijn, barbc56 and AndyPR like this.
  5. Hustler

    Hustler I m a hustler

    Messages:
    56
    Likes:
    26
    Europe
    Forever young
    Forever healthy
     
  6. dannybex

    dannybex Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes:
    2,194
    Seattle
    Well, now that you've nailed hers down, try these, which you ignored:

    If they had seen a link to autism before publication of their paper, why wasn't that mentioned in the 'original paper'?

    Were children's lives not worth it until she decided she had no choice 'but to play the autism card'?

    Where are the 'family studies' she's talking about and where's 'the fact' that there was an 'association' with all those other diseases?

    If there's "no doubt", then why were there more than a dozen follow-up studies from all around the world that indeed showed 'doubt'?

    If she claims that only 5% of people infected with "the virus" get sick, then how can she also claim that there is any association with a retrovirus and ME/CFS when 95% don't get sick?

    If she's correct, then why isn't her life-long collaborator, Frank Ruscetti backing up ANY of the wild claims? Why didn't he endorse her book? Is he part of the conspiracy too?

    And lastly, why, if there's a clear and obvious retroviral connection, hasn't the pharmaceutical companies that make billions off of antiretroviral drugs offered to fund her research?

    That's nine specific questions. Please skip the haiku and provide nine specific answers.
     
  7. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,652
    Likes:
    5,007
    I'd rather pour it over Mikovist head.

    There are so many well researched and informative responses that make this thread worth it. I have bookmarked some of the references.

    Thanks!
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2017
    dannybex likes this.
  8. Kina

    Kina

    Messages:
    10,132
    Likes:
    17,219
    Sofa, UK
    We don't usually discuss moderation issues on threads but in this case we feel it is necessary.

    Hustler was banned last night after we discerned that he had been previously banned for multiple rule breaches.

    He was not banned for any content posted on this thread or other threads.

    Just wanted to make that clear because at times members make erroneous assumptions as to why a member has been banned.

    Thank you.
     
    RogerBlack, dannybex, barbc56 and 4 others like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page