Hi everyone!
I had Ron read the whole Canary article. He would like everyone to know that those three things he mentioned in his talk, biotin, et al, are not "biomarkers". Biomarkers will be things that we use that will enable us to accurately diagnose ME/CFS, and will likely not be one thing. These things he mentioned were examples of metabolites that are low in some ME/CFS patients that can cause symptoms. They may be components of whatever turns out to be a biomarker, but we're not there yet. I'm not sure if it's worth trying to correct that in the article. What do you think? We can't control everything that gets printed. We just like to do our best to be sure people are getting accurate information. Ron chuckled when he saw the part about how he has "loads" of money. That would be nice and help the research go faster! The article is really great though, and sure sends the right message! NOT IN OUR HEADS! and, GOOD SCIENCE IS HAPPENING WITH HOPE FOR MORE!