I just feel that I have to respond to Dainty's report that her boss had "witnessed countless healing transformations" by Dr. Klinghart. Faith healers also have plenty of patients who claim to have been healed, and might even be honestly convinced that they were healed, yet such claims don't hold up to scientific examination, with before and after examinations, etc. I've read (not sure if it's true) that in Africa, it's quite common for men to believe that their penis has vanished, and instead of their friends calming him down, they panic and believe that theirs has disappeared too. Belief often overrides commons sense.
When I followed Kina's link to a report on Klinghart's quackery, my thought was "Wow, what total BS!" Quackery is certainly big business though. Probably has been since humans developed speech. Maybe even before. (picture caveman pantomiming with rhino horn for penis enlargement)
People are free to believe that Dr. Klinghart is a true miracle worker, and fork over their cash. I just wanted to point out that "witnessed healings" should not be taken as reliable evidence of actual biological improvement.