A New Decade of ME Research: The 11th Invest in ME International ME Conference 2016
Mark Berry presents the first in a series of articles on the 11th Invest in ME International ME Conference in London ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Which glutathione?

Discussion in 'General Treatment' started by Cheesus, Apr 27, 2014.

  1. PeterPositive

    PeterPositive Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes:
    865
    I've seen those too. Very expensive product and not very convincing from a scientific standpoint. They claim all sorts of fabulous effects but is there any real independent evidence that they work?

    If they really do, it would be pretty groundbreaking.
     
  2. Mya Symons

    Mya Symons Mya Symons

    Messages:
    1,010
    Likes:
    341
    Wyoming
    I agree. Seems to good to be true.
     
  3. PeterPositive

    PeterPositive Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes:
    865
  4. picante

    picante Senior Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes:
    622
    Helena, MT USA
    It looks like there's a pretty glaring difference:
    The Swanson cream lists "Setria® glutathione [as L-glutathione (oxidized)]".
    The Kirkman Labs bottle says (in all caps): "EACH 1 GRAM (MEASURING SCOOP ENCLOSED) SUPPLIES 180 MG. OF REDUCED L-GLUTATHIONE."

    If you're having trouble reducing oxidized glutathione, why would you take oxidized glutathione?
    This is an old thread, but I'd sure be interested in hearing from anyone who has taken any transdermal glutathione, reduced or not.
     
  5. kyzcreig

    kyzcreig Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    Likes:
    32
    Houston
    I did switch back to kirkman and found it better
     
    picante likes this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page