Review: 'Through the Shadowlands’ describes Julie Rehmeyer's ME/CFS Odyssey
I should note at the outset that this review is based on an audio version of the galleys and the epilogue from the finished work. Julie Rehmeyer sent me the final version as a PDF, but for some reason my text to voice software (Kurzweil) had issues with it. I understand that it is...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"When does peer review make no damn sense?" (Andrew Gelman)

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Feb 2, 2016.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,672
    Likes:
    28,181
    http://andrewgelman.com/2016/02/01/peer-review-make-no-damn-sense/

    I think that patients (and other family members/similar) can add new and useful perspectives that can be missed by reviewers.

     
    barbc56, PatJ, Mrs Sowester and 14 others like this.
  2. whodathunkit

    whodathunkit Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,158
    Likes:
    1,469
    Peer-review is also subject to cronyism. And commercialism (pay-to-publish or pay for positive/problem-free review).

    And more disturbingly these days, "popular narrative"-support-ism (support of a popular narrative regardless of whether it's scientifically supportable).

    Peer-review seems subject also to general stupid-ism, in that a lot of what gets published in ostensibly reputable publications apparently isn't reviewed by the brightest lights on the tree.

    That said, there is no fool-proof system. We all know that reviewers spam "cattle call" review systems like Yelp and Amazon to either make the thing being reviewed seem much worse or much better than it really is. Perhaps a blend of the two systems would be best: let it pass actual peer review, then put it in the open to be reviewed by others.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2016
    ahmo and helen1 like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page