• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

What is wrong with our bodies

Research 1st

Severe ME, POTS & MCAS.
Messages
768
Has anyone see this by Lin et al?

Finally, reverse transcription-PCR analysis showed the presence of MuLV in three other human B-cell lines (DG75, Ramos, and P3HR1 Cl.13) commonly used by investigators in the Epstein-Barr virus field. We believe that a thorough examination of tissue culture microbiomes using RNA-seq/PARSES-like approaches is critical for the appropriate utilization of these systems in biological studies.

Detection of MLV in the EBV+ human B-cell line JY, using a computational RNA-Seq-based exogenous agent detection pipeline, PARES.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22238296


Fantasizing again for a moment.

Imagine being bitten by a mosquito or tick one-day in your back yard as child and ending up decades later with an untreatable chronic low grade neuroinflammation (ME) because this process of being bitten, activates pathogen driven autoimmunity requiring a certain gene profile suited to it. Thus you get it, and not your whole road.

Imagine being sneezed on in work or school, and mutant EBV strains activating HERV's also. You might then catch EBV, and wake up with MS (as people can after EBV).

If that ever happened, it would be best, politically to call it CFS and blame the patients for neurotic beliefs in symptoms. If they get mouthy, claim they are dangerous militants and the victims are people who make it policy the patients are neurotic and need CBT GE when they have an uncontrolled inflammatory process damaging their brain, very slowly. Almost sounds like what Borrelia could do to you with Alzheimer's.

For ME, I await the long lost mutant prion, explaining the loss of PrPC in ME patients and it's cousin, a pathogenic HERV. Presumably not MSRV!
 
Last edited:

halcyon

Senior Member
Messages
2,482
In this regard I find a recent publication about recruitment of T-cells to damaged tissues very interesting.
It's reasons like these that I think we have to be careful when interpreting the meaning of response to rituximab in ME patients. As you said, it's a system. When you remove one part of a system it affects the whole and the behavior of any other individual components that interacted with the removed part.

"think sphincter"
:rofl:

and that polyclonal expansion of B-cells is taking place
This is one of Lipkin's previous findings yes.

I'm convinced cytotoxic T-cells are invading healthy tissues
Are you really convinced that it's healthy tissue?

We have repeatedly crossed viruses and bacteria off the list of suspects because "everybody has them".
Yes well hopefully we'll realize our folly here and stop crossing them off the list soon.
 

SDSue

Southeast
Messages
1,066
What we do know though is that isolated muscle cells, which are not impacted by autonomic issues, are still defective. (This also kills the psychobabble arguments.)
Are you talking about mitochondrial muscle biopsies? Have they been studied in ME?

Had a mito function test done and was 100%. Mito function tests low correlation of results V patient state,
Was this the citrate synthase test? I had it done and my mito function was deplorable. Citrate synthase was nearly 300% over normal.
 

Research 1st

Severe ME, POTS & MCAS.
Messages
768
Hi Lansbergen. Well unofficially, then yes, some PWME do have very low PrPC, almost absent.
You can test yourself here, experimentally:

http://redlabs.be/red-labs/ordering-tests/request-forms.php

Low blood PrPC isn't much to right home about in terms of a specific disease process. Really, you want CSF (spinal fluid) PrpC to be through the floor for anything 'dodgy' to be suspected as neurological. Additionally one can't do anything with the result of missing PrPC for sure, the test is experimental and not 'proof' of much.

Where things get interesting for me as a science hobbyist, is if a misfolded prion test becomes available, such as a saliva test, or sexual fluids test. (One theoretical worry here is if theoretical ME rogue prions are transmissible between close contact people). A mother breastfeeding her child included of course...

In terms of ME, I am speculating this would only affect family members, or we'd all have ME in some way or another and we don't. There are only 'clusters' (as in vCJD (human BSE). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1348584/Missing-link-in-villages-CJD-cluster.html

I also think sexual transmission of the putative agent behind 'ME' is a possibility. (Some PWME/CFS claim they 'caught' their condition from their sexual partner, as do PWLyme). Remember that paper on Lyme sexual secretions in married partners?

http://www.onlineprnews.com/news/45...y-be-sexually-transmitted-study-suggests.html

Yet most? PWME can't have sex. So the incidence (if ME is a genetic STD) would be much lower than the average person 18-50 who is sexually active and making babies.

I think if the same ME patient is proven to have very low PrPC in conjunction with exceedingly high misfolded prion protein levels (potentially allied to 'ME') - and then allied to a certain class of novel infection, then, things get interesting. I don't know if you know, but in BSE, the normal PrPC is transcribed to the roque prion PrpSC. Thus, theoretically, if a human has absent PrPC and has a mystery neurological disease (such as ME), things aren't exactly looking up for them if this was repeated in CSF by spinal tap. But, as already mentioned, no proof at all that blood PrpC loss means your brain is affected, infected, inflamed etc. It just makes the possibility more likely in % chance. Skeptics might say 0.0% rise to 0.1%.

In my view, if a finding of loss of PrPC in PWME can then be repeated (biomarker diagnosed PWME) by finding the same thing either in tissue (lymphoid tissue) or CSF fluid then basically you could propose that ME, is associated to a prion misfolding process, perhaps leading to cognitive dysfunction or immune suppression/activation. (Activation leading to suppression).

A paper I read ages ago in animals showed that if you infected the animals (can't remember which) the brain is infected via the gut (Spleen I think it was actually). Maybe I'm confused as it was injected in the brain, and the prions were found in the Spleen? (My memory is bad, sorry).

Either way, the 'bad' prion (PrPSc) traveled via the lymphatic system = major bad news for the animal. Either way, this is more alarming if the human host doesn't have much of a blood brain barrier. Many have proposed, and I guess in the future you can prove, that certain processes diminish the blood brain barrier and let pathogens in to PWME's brains. More rife speculation, this could be one method of how 'we' get Lyme or co-pathogens (Mycoplasma?) in our brains leading to cognitive impairment and other neurological disabilities. (NB: Impossible to prove with current technology without a brain biopsy in ME patients). Who will autopsy people who need CBT/GE? No one. A tiny percentage of patients. Handfuls worldwide. Without the psych lobby, this never would have happened. However, it is what is is now and we can't change the status quo without robust scientific evidence (that isn't funded in large scale studies sadly).

Theoretically, away from animal models of prions of BSE, the same could happen to PWME if they have a stomach pathogen, or some other pathogen that infected lymphoid tissue that worms its way up into your brain to cause a chronic low grade, immune response via HERV's utilizing prions. DeMeirleir's paper found immunoreactivity in ME stomach tissue (notice tissue, not blood), to retroviral proteins in a tiny number of patients and no controls.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=meirleir retrovirus

I wouldn't be shocked to see a group of scientists announce that subsets of very severe ME is a potential prion disease caused by HERV's, perhaps associated to a Lyme like pathogen, turbocharging retroviral or its own bacterial genes (and you get an autoimmune response from this).

PWME have an RN-aseL defect called low molecular weight RNase-L. With a RN-aseL defect, you have little defense against RNA Viruses - a slight problem as you'll always be sick due to cross infection unless you live in a cave. Retroviruses are RNA viruses that reverse transcribe into DNA viruses for life and infect the host, forever genetically. NB: Reverse transcriptase (RT) has been found in PWCFS by Elaine De Freitas, and others in the 1990's. Thus PWCFS do have some form of retroviral activation going on and the 2011 Lipkin study of ending all retroviral CFS research once and for all, was clearly political if you consider the past research on 'CFS' was ignored when it comes to the finding of RT decades before 'XMRV'. (No one was told this, in the anti Mikovits blogs of course). Why tell the truth? People just want more answers. So the 'truth' is selective. Control the masses, keep the patients uniformed, then they demand less, and have less power as a community, as a movement, as a minority.

Naturally, people with a modus operandi fooled the public and concentrated on the fictional human infection (of one form), 'XMRV'. Behind a 4 letter label, there are of course, limitless forms of 'XMRV' and retroviruses though! Not just the one Silverman created in his lab and incorrectly associated it to CFS in 2009 by contaminating the WPI samples. (Novel retrovirus was isolated from patients and photographed by Elaine De Freitas as well in the 1990's). Mikovits was not the first.

In a subtle condition like ME (patients don't commonly die unlike untreated HIV), there doesn't need to be a whole retrovirus, there could just be a dead floating around gene envelope in ME (such as the neurotoxic SFFV). CFS and controls had antibodies to SFFV in the Alter/Lipkin paper at 3%. Link to PDF: http://mbio.asm.org/content/3/5/e00266-12.full.pdf+html

SFFV research is the reserve of cancer researchers. And yes, the inference is lab science accidentally caused recombination pathogens to exist in humans by (unaware at the time) new vectors, such as aerosolisation of retrovirus that mixed animals and human tissue such as by xenografting practice.

It's easy to just concentrate on fatigue using no screening tests and less so on culpability of an honest accident. For that you need a distraction; psychologists encouraged to propose a theory for behavioural changes (their own religion) in the infected host. Fund then handsomely to maintain the ruse, whist starving biomedical science of appropriate levels of science funding for those with inflammatory disabling disease.

That's how we all ended up in this mess. I got sick as a kid and I'm old enough to be a grandparent. Times me by tens of millions of people and you have a huge problem hidden in plain sight. Just call it CFS and no one will care. When autoimmunity develops, deny Chronic Lyme and no one will care either as they'll all 'suspect' patients with loopy ideas with normal Full blood counts and X-rays. (As are people with MS).

But find evidence you can give it to other people, such as from a babies pacifier? (If mom is infected and babies have poor immunity), then they really can't hide that. Women who develop CFS in the middle of a pregnancy cannot donate cord blood. Why is that? Did their neurosis (needing CBT) pass onto the baby unhindered, but could be given to another person if the stem cells are utilised? No, it's about what umbilical stem cells harbour that are potentially transmisisble, hence the UK Ban for CFS moms with child.

Independent researchers are our only hope. Good people exist in science, they're just broke!
 
Last edited:

anciendaze

Senior Member
Messages
1,841
...Are you really convinced that it's healthy tissue?
For the most part I think so. All of us who have chickenpox as children retain viral episomes for VZV in places like our dorsal root ganglia. For most of us this does no harm until weakened immune response loses the ability to hold VZV latent, when we develop shingles. When T-cells invade dorsal root ganglia going after viral invaders they often do significant damage, leaving evidence like nodules of Nageotte. You really don't want cytotoxic T-cells attacking nerves.

In other cases invasive immune cells destroy parts of endocrine organs. This could explain many cases of diabetes. A fairly high percentage of ME/CFS patients show problems with thyroid similar to Hashimoto's thyroiditis. I suspect many of us have some degree of damage to the pituitary, which would be enough to cause the problems seen in the HPA axis. (If there is apparent damage to the hypothalamus or adrenals, I haven't notice publications on this. Either I overlooked some, or this might be another example of common practice shifting patients to a different diagnostic category, and different specialists, when damage is localized to particular organs.)

Finally, most of us seem to have diffuse damage to cardiovascular tissues. Cardiologists don't see this as a heart problem, but investigation into endothelial dysfunction in this disease continues. I am still wondering about the statement I heard quoted out of Stanford that we did not have a heart problem per se when compared with people with similar low levels of activity.

Where did they find people with comparable levels of activity who did not have really serious pathologies?

Now, it is possible all the different tissues and organs mentioned are diseased, or at least infected. If this is true, and if the pathogen is not a trivial threat, then we are much closer to death's door than we feel. I'm holding out for a more positive interpretation: that our immune systems are misdirected, and some components may be deranged.
 

Misfit Toy

Senior Member
Messages
4,178
Location
USA
totally agree! If we fit into the classical model of autoimmune disease it wouldn't be so hard to find a biomarker. I feel like this is going to be a totally new kind of illness umbrella, with lots of subsets.
I know a couple of people with 'classic' autoimmune diseases and I sometimes wonder what is worse: the symptoms of their disease, or the side effects of their agressive treatment. A rock and a hard place. But at least they have a choice...


Yes. I have an autoimmune disease and the medicines are worse than the condition. It upsets me to know there are treatments, but I can't handle them. But sadly, many with AI diseases can't.

And...then having CFS/ME on top of it.
 

lansbergen

Senior Member
Messages
2,512
I wouldn't be shocked to see a group of scientists announce that subsets of very severe ME is a potential prion disease caused by HERV's, perhaps associated to a Lyme like pathogen, turbocharging retroviral or its own bacterial genes (and you get an autoimmune response from this).

I have been following the TSE research for decades. ERV activation is associated wit TSE but it is not the cause.

Hi Lansbergen. Well unofficially, then yes, some PWME do have very low PrPC, almost absent.

You can test yourself here, experimentally:

http://redlabs.be/red-labs/ordering-tests/request-forms.php

Additionally one can't do anything with the result of missing PrPC for sure, the test is experimental and not 'proof' of much.

I know.
 

anciendaze

Senior Member
Messages
1,841
We have a plethora of potential pathogens. (How's that for alliteration?) In addition to possible active HERVs, which are in everyone who has been tested, just about everyone has a list of herpes-type DNA viruses: HSV, VZV, EBV, CMV, HHV-6/7. This list omits such common DNA viruses as HPV, some strains of which cause most uterine cervical cancer.

When you talk about "Lyme-like" bacteria, you still have a list. There are multiple species of borrelia which require different test kits most U.S. doctors do not use. Borrelia miyamotoi was only recently added to the list of spirochetes U.S. citizens could acquire from ticks because an exceptionally assiduous pathologist found it in CSF of a very sick patient. At present there is no specific test for b. miyamotoi, something which concerns me because that species is found in wild turkeys which wander all over the southeast. Most of the cases found have tested positive with standard b. burghdorferi test kits. Because the false negative rate on those kits is high, even for b. burghdorferi, I do not believe they are catching a high percentage of infections they were not designed to catch.

(We may have the logical short circuit involved in the question of "does the light in the refrigerator go off when the door is closed?" If some cases turn up in tests, this tells you nothing about those that don't. If authorities don't want to find anything in cases that test negative, it is pretty easy to avoid this. The hand-waving that goes on in saying these are sort of like b. burgdorferi or b. afzerii or b. garinii might pass muster in a sophomore bull session, or might not.)

Beyond species of borrelia you can stay in the category of spirochetes infecting humans without making an effort. Treponema pallidum which causes syphilis definitely is a human pathogen. Another species in the same genus is widespread in humans: treponema denticola. For most people, most of the time, this species does not appear to cause significant disease. The exceptions? People who suffer dementia before they die often have spirochetes in the brain, and t. denticola is one of them. There are several other spirochetes which turn up.

I think the hypothesis that many diseases of unknown etiology are caused by immune dysfunction less catastrophic than AIDS is a good candidate for future research. This seems more productive than shooting down candidate pathogens one at a time on the grounds they do not obey rules developed in dealing with acute infectious diseases which are rapidly lethal. Public health costs of chronic disease have become far too large to allow present neglect of etiology and prevention to continue.
 

heapsreal

iherb 10% discount code OPA989,
Messages
10,104
Location
australia (brisbane)
@anciendaze
i think you're right . Some of us feel better treating certain pathogens but we never really recovered. The immune dysfunction is whats keeping us down.

reading what you have just written reminds me of when i first started researching cfs and was looking into mycoplasma and l-form bacteria as well as cell wall deficient bacteria . I think they could still be a problem for some but they aren't the goose that layed the golden egg.

its frightening to think how many hours i have spent researching cfsme as well as many other patients.
 

anciendaze

Senior Member
Messages
1,841
@heapsreal

In troubleshooting complex systems like aircraft I learned that the single fault assumption commonly used in training mechanics is merely a simple hypothesis which catches some problems at the lowest level of maintenance. This also depends on having a carefully maintained system to start with. Once you allow faults to accumulate troubleshooting becomes much, much harder. When a system does not meet those simplifying assumptions it is generally sent to depot-level maintenance, where they take everything apart and test each major component separately. The single-fault hypothesis is a social convention which depends on the existence of those other levels of maintenance to catch problems which violate it.

Chronic disease often violates the corresponding convenient assumption of a single pathogen, and I don't see any way to avoid searching for multiple problems if you must wait six months for a diagnosis. The idea of sending human beings to depot-level maintenance does not appeal to me.
 
Last edited:

anciendaze

Senior Member
Messages
1,841
Just an added thought: what does anyone know about the changes that take place when any kind of patient recovers from a "flu-like illness"? Every doctor knows that some people bounce back in days, while others take weeks. It isn't until this goes on for six months that anyone is allowed to diagnose CFS.

It is obvious that something other than deep psychological problems is considered responsible for recoveries in the range of weeks. Since everyone in reasonable health survives a number of these episodes in a lifetime, and experiences some kind of recovery, we ought to have some criteria for variations in recovery which account for millions of lost work-hours. Identify those and you should have a biomarker for ME/CFS.

Am I wrong in saying that no one has the slightest idea what takes place in a normal recovery to health after a "flu-like illness"? If I am right in saying this, why hasn't anyone studied such important physiological processes seriously?
 

heapsreal

iherb 10% discount code OPA989,
Messages
10,104
Location
australia (brisbane)
Just an added thought: what does anyone know about the changes that take place when any kind of patient recovers from a "flu-like illness"? Every doctor knows that some people bounce back in days, while others take weeks. It isn't until this goes on for six months that anyone is allowed to diagnose CFS.

It is obvious that something other than deep psychological problems is considered responsible for recoveries in the range of weeks. Since everyone in reasonable health survives a number of these episodes in a lifetime, and experiences some kind of recovery, we ought to have some criteria for variations in recovery which account for millions of lost work-hours. Identify those and you should have a biomarker for ME/CFS.

Am I wrong in saying that no one has the slightest idea what takes place in a normal recovery to health after a "flu-like illness"? If I am right in saying this, why hasn't anyone studied such important physiological processes seriously?


Interesting article recently saying the flu is becoming more wide spread and appears year round and basically telling people to get vaccinated. My thoughts are that I don't understand how, if more and more people are getting influenza . If anything the incidence of flu should be coming down.

So I don't think they really understand influenza at all?
 

anciendaze

Senior Member
Messages
1,841
@heapsreal

I'm talking about recovery from "flu-like illness", not simply infections by a particular strain like H1N1. A wide range of infections, even by very different pathogens like parasites, produce those familiar gastrointestinal symptoms. It is also part of medical folklore that patients exhibit "depression" during this period, even without any evidence of previous psychiatric problems, and usually this is more pronounced after viral infections than bacterial infections.

How far have we actually come from casting horoscopes to explain influenza?

I'd also wonder if anyone is curious about what goes on in recovering patients to see what is missing in those who die of disease. If it is a missing factor, rather than something added by pathogens, no amount of investigation limited to those serious cases which cross diagnostic thresholds is going to find it.
 

Chriswolf

Senior Member
Messages
130
@anciendaze

Interesting remarks about T-cell damage, I myself have both CFS and a biopsy confirming lymphocyte infiltration of a salivary gland. I've also had a documented case of mono.

So I have all three of the necessary indicators for your hypothesis.

And yet I'm prescribed anti depressants, it's an absolute joke.

Additionally, I've noted a considerable loss in strength especially in the last year, whereas 10 years ago I was working jobs that required me to lift many thousands of pounds total in a day.

Now my arms can feel as if I had done that, without adequate rest or nutrition, after doing absolutely nothing at all. Just a persistent ache in my arms, shoulders and neck as if I had endured many days of intense exertion, making it very difficult to move at times.